Actually the ppsh box giving a Lot problems His buggy recoil and laser dispersion, and actually the german mp40 and ZK are decent weapons but both cannot deal against the ppsh so i suggest put the mp-41 in the tech tree to counter this moustrosity
: )
11 Likes
DF should just finally fix the box mag ppsh41, players have been complaining about it for months now.
12 Likes
Is something that can actually be probable but considering that DF ignore our suggestions well… Is a quite difficult ngl
3 Likes
Fix what?
Back in the day it was a laser and widely used by the ussr (not as much used as the Mosin ofc).
It is okay for BRIII - it has pros and cons. MKb42(H) and (W) should be lowered to BRIII/IV as a counter - those weapons were developed in 1941 and first tested in 42/43 so even the time period would fit. That would be the only fix I would do especially because the guns are useless and underpowered in BRV. 500-550rpm and a bit more recoil but more damage.
6 Likes
i think max. BR IV for MkB42 would be fine,
but instead of lowering MP40 to BR II they could upgrade the stats (maybe firerate to 1000 aswell) to make a counter of ppsha possible in BR III, because BR II had allready MP 38 and Beretta wich are equal to actual MP40
Atleast germany has to many equal BR II SMG´s
2 Likes
BR4 doesn’t exist you are always playing vs BR5. So it’s a waste of time of both DF coders and ours, i will still not be able to use them since at BR5 i will get destroyed.
Only at BR3 it would be finally playable, in downtiers it would be too strong just like PPSh-41 box. We need a new MM which would make BR2 to play only vs BR1-2 and BR3 to fight vs BR3-4, make BR5 separate in a MM, then even it at BR4 it would be fine there since you will be safe from high br and low br.
no such thing as MP40 with 1000 rof ever existed
3 Likes
ZK is literally mg in smg slot. USSR has dp27, germany has mg34, is that normal?
1 Like
It has artificially nerfed dmg per bullet
And what of the Allies to counter the StG wannabes?
1 Like
Sounds like a you issue if you can’t use IV in V when some of us can use II in V
I can even use bolt rifles and reach top of the scoreboard at BR5 and that’s with Lebel 1886 that is pretty much a BR0 weapon. Will i win the match? Most likely not. Would i win them with STG44? most likely yes.
Same with MKB42/STG45/Horn just because you can nerf yourself doesn’t mean it will be worth it, now put yourself in a shoe of f2p player that only has a few upgraded mkbs and he will go against fully upgraded Assaulter with AS-44 or Fedorov. He will die every single time.
Mkb42(h)/(w), STG45 and Horn should go down to BR4 and BR5 should be prohibited from fighting BR4. If new MM is not present then bring them to BR3.
600rof/20 ammo - BR4
1000 rof/30 ammo - BR5
Introduce them with AR Engineer event and let them carry it and have them fully upgraded with that event squad ofc.
1 Like
So if you think experienced BR IV players fighting maxed out Federovs is bad, why do you think shifting this supposed problem to newbies in BR II fighting maxed out StG protos will fix the issue here? Just trying to understand YOUR reasoning here. Cause frankly it just looks like you can’t handle Russia with your equipment, and you want a booster seat against them at the expense of everyone else. Which don’t fly in my opinion. Not to mention you seem to be 100% neglecting the soft rule that will try to pair you with as many people at the same BR as you as possible. Meaning you won’t “always” fight V’s, or at the very least won’t always fight a team of V’s. I’m sure you can handle whatever III’s are in the Russian team since that’s what you think your equipment is equal against. Unless you just wanna try to bully II’s that badly with your StG wannabe. Everyone else gets their intermediate cartridge auto’s at V but not Germany, no they are special little gamers and need theirs in III
Look, Germany needs a handful of “fixes.” Your dispersion for most guns is higher than others, your belt fed MG’s are on diets, your FG 42 is on semi by default and its bayonet is folded. Stuff that kinda sets you at a disadvantage sometimes. In some ways. Personally I thing the belt fed is the only real issue here, but that’s just me being biased against the Krauts. I still think the Dicker Max should go back up in BR where it belongs. Also it has a bigger HE shell than the 105 Sherman? Which is entirely 100% bull and there is suspicion it’s the naval 105 shell, but hey Germany suffers amiright? High velocity 105. Low velocity 105. High velocity has a bigger explosion despite the fact the higher velocity means the shell walls have to be thicker which means less internal space for explosive but whatever I guess. Kraut space magic!
Minor rant aside, I just don’t see why your “not an StG” needs to be lowered down to III. IV sounds perfectly fine as is, but don’t you dare touch MM. It’s almost ok exactly how it is, and I can live with it. Definitely worse than no BR system at all, but I still see my Enlisted inside of this WT Infantry Edition packaging. The MM, specifically how BR III works, is like the Cosco hotdog. A relic of an older, better time that must be preserved at all costs
1 Like
Another person who wants to deliberately devalue the uniqueness of my event items based on a very dubious “balance argument”.
No, thank you. Devs can buff/tweak smgs that are already present in the tech tree to combat balance issues. No need to rob players of their unique event rewards.
1 Like
At Least the shitty StG 45 (M) could be lowerd with its disturbing 450 rpm its even worser than MkB
1 Like
Thompsons with higher rof and maybe better accuracy (the MKb42(W) has an awfull accuracy, the accuracy of the MKb42(H) is a bit better but still inferior) and the Papashka41 box with waaaaaay more rof and laser accuracy. In close combat those weapons still will be better compared to the MKb’s.
1 Like
In CQB, yes, but what of mid range? That’s where the assault rifle dominates
2 Likes
In my experience you have 50% CQB and 50% longer distances. Most moscow maps are more urban fighting, many normandy maps have both. Sure there also are maps with mid range, but you CANT have a gun that fits perfect in every scenario.
I guess it would be a “lol just got sniped by a MKb42” vs. “oh, I just brrrrrt that squad hiding in that room”.
In my opinion it really would be a great fit where both the PPSH41/Thompson and the MKb42 will dominate in specific areas. Pro’s and con’s.
1 Like
PPSH br two and Thompson br trhe are great , MP 41 should be br four so I do not like the german kill me with my own weapon
Hmm. Suppose you’ve got me there. It definitely would make fighting Germans in Low Tier much more annoying though