The point is IL 2s are good at both.
I have also suggested some love for the IL 10.
You are comparing a bf110 and a IL 2 using stats. Its relevant to say that in practice, IL 2s are just as destructive and better dog fighters
Stats arent telling the whole story. There is feeling, and reality
They are always right about speed and climb rate in my experience. Only some things are different with the turning time, which in my experience, the BF 110 C7 turns a little better than the IL 10.
Take any BR 3 fighter in test. Fly straight and level. You will see the speed stat has little to do with the speed they will actually achieve under powered flight
Try the fw 190 A 8 to really make the point
Well, I meant relative, as far as I know, nothing shows you speed while flying.
I will do this.
Well, I checked some speeds. To do this, I took some planes to the training ground and And I measured the time it took them to travel that long dirt road. The statistics were pretty much correct (although there were some slight errors). And as for the C7 and IL10, the C7 did this in 8.5 seconds and the IL10 in 10 seconds. Overall, according to my tests, the IL 10 is slower than the C7.
The rotation speed also depends on many conditions, I don’t know how to compare it exactly, but according to experience and statistics, the C7’s rotation speed is better.
If they move it to BR IV we can test if its still bad can be BR III.
But sadly there is a lot of planes that need BR changes and better bombs.
Thats true many people belive that Ki-100 is insane just looking at the stats.
I’m testing now Ki -100 against energy traps its very bad but people look the stats and think its insane plane… however it loses energy very fast. Sadly I need to die a lot to test that but so far against P-51D-5 is very balanced a good P-51D-5 pilot can easily deal with Ki -100 but its funny when beginner pilots complain its too strong xD
Not sure what you are looking at, but if you got by datamine speeds A-8 is as fast as mustang and la 5 is hugely slower. Not reflected in game
Id more suggest its wing rip speed
That’s possible, but they take about a year for each transfer.
Anyway, they moved FW from 5 to 3, so I don’t think a two br transfer is impossible.(Of course, everything is impossible for the Soviets, it took months for them to give the Soviets AVT 40 20 and also a br2 semi auto)
I just measured the time it takes to travel a certain distance. And yes, as I said, some things are not correct. That’s why I specifically compared the speed of the IL 10 and the C7, where the C7 was faster. You can also do a speed test for yourself.
My suggestion was br 4 buff payload or BR 3.
Im not disagreeing with the topic.
I took issue with the downplaying of a seriously cracked air plane (IL 2 series)…cant let it stand when changes are made based on poor experience
Its an enlisted myth the soviets have bad rockets, they are excellent…they just arent HVARs (ie total noob friendly)
Well there is even more broken plane its called P-38 Lightning so the IL 2 is very strong ground attacker at BR II but definitely its not better then the P-38:
Meanwhile Japanese ground attackers don’t have guns or have one little poor MG even the BR III ground attacker is bugged and cant land on the carrier since its shaking like it has Parkinson syndrome… 
Not to mention even the slowing process is worse then on F4U there is really something broken with the D4Y1.
This one was already noted, to either BR 4 with payload changes or BR 3
In other words, the Soviet side cannot have 250kg bombs on Br 3. but at the same time the axis but it can have Br. 3 aircraft with two or more 250kg bombs.
in terms of flight characteristics, the IL10 is worse than both Bf110s, which are on BR3, have 2/250 kg bombs, and 20 mm guns penetrate the “strong and unbalanced” KV1. But yes, in your opinion, such aircraft should probably only be in Germany
Same can be said about the planes with both rockets and bombs or those with 6 100 kg bombs. Germany just has no direct counterpart for them.
Isnt there a BR 1 german plane with 2x 200kg bombs? IL-10 should be more than fine at BR 3.
Well, 250-kilogram bombs are more powerful than 100-kilogram bombs, and 100-kilogram bombs are much less effective. Six 100-kilogram bombs are less effective than one or two 200-250-kilogram bombs.
If you like have of weak useless bombs okay, let’s replace these bombs on these planes with these ones.
Here’s a list
Potez 633 2-200kg → 8-50kg
Bf 110 C-7 2-250kg → 12-50kg
Plane mentor saw that cringe post and asked me to post this since he cannot at the moment (no 2 match per week quota, too high on spice melange)
I’m just the messenger.
<Registration date 2021
<Newbie.
Okay, keep me posted
here: