While Soviets once get their 100 round lmg are playing like having STG44 /w 100 mag
With para buff (RD-44 from the box) they will become even more overpowered. There will be zero point in playing as Germany anymore.
With para buff (RD-44 from the box) they will become even more overpowered. There will be zero point in playing as Germany anymore.
ok yes The USSR has a ten shot SA BR3, what about the US/UK the Winchester is not tech tree
The only tech tree US/UK SA 10 shot is the Johnson that uses two stripper clips just like the Gewehr 41
now if you want to remove the ability for Germany/Axis to fight US/UK fair enough
but stop acting like Germany only fights Russia
so unless you want to magic the johnson to the johnson r that can reload from a magazine i say no 
1 Like
tanks are their own story , also planes
many say that some infantry weapon disadvantage is balanced with better airplane than enemy has at same BR , or better tank
but it doesnt provide a solution for the infantry guy
sure the tank can be very helpful but only if the guy in it knows how to play with it , and is also kinda lucky to survive long enough to provide fire support to make an impact on gameplay
that said infantry in this game cannot rely on tanks or planes since they are used by players who not always do with their vehicles what would be the most beneficial for pushing the objective
for example
why should i be in disadvantage for not be able to use G43 at BR3 just because my faction has better airplane than enemy , when our airplanes pilot is either noob , or cannot do bombing cause it is in dogfight by Indestructible IL-2 ?
also it is infantry that can take over objective point , not a tank and not plane , even when both can contribute to it greatly , that does not justify infantry weapon nerfs for vehicle buffs
1 Like
Americans can carry both M1 + Johnson which results in 18 rounds with separate ammo pools. Both weapons are loading much faster than garbage G41. Are we going to ignore that?
1 Like
the garand loads faster because it only has 8 rounds and one magazine not ten in two stripper clips, and no the johnson does not load faster than the gewehr 41. and in order for them to do that they have to forsake taking a back pack. if you want to carry two guns find a garand analogue or nerf the gewehr 43 to eight rounds and then move it to br3.
I dont know why - but I am MUCH more accurate using ZH instead of G43, kinda weird…
1 Like
thing is allies has Lee Enfield , M1 Garand , M1 Carbine and thompsons to cope for that minor two round ammo difference between Garand and G41 or G43
alternatively a buff to g41 could also be tried out for starters
3 Likes
me too and i think its cause it has more horizontal recoil than other traditional rifles and its easier to mitigate that than vertical recoil, its generally not hard to learn the pattern at which ZH shoots
bolt action rifle, eight rounds, not a full caliber rifle, a sub machine gun limiting it to assaulters
should i point to the 50 round br mg the Germans have for no reason.
advantage for USA, advantage for USA, advantage for USA, advantage for USA
BAR is much stronger than MG34 in most cases
1 Like
ok lets trade
german has no 10 rnd BA, can be fast to shoot with respective perk, 8 rnd SA again its two rounds shorter so not a big deal for allied gigachad, M1 carbine has the same ammo as M2 Carbine or Hyde 44 and after ROF unnerf that happened year or so ago its actually not that bad and its ammo is considered to be intermediate in here eventually, thompsons gives good punch and many uses it as assault rifle anyway
oh and BAR that also behaves like AR from the introduction of normandy campaign
2 Likes
aaah the beloved WZ.28 with vertical recoil perk
an early STG … good times i had with these
Germany has 2 one at BR3 and one at BR4
The one at BR3 works just like the Johnson 1941, The Gewehr is a ten round gun fed by two five round stripper clips, and its two rounds more i dont care if its one round more that 25 percent superiority in ammo with no downside its mathematically a better weapon
Give us the Johnson R no German power creep
Yet another power creep suggestion that goes straight against any sense of balance.
2 Likes
Vg-3 isnt as fast to shoot as lee enfield , im primarily using regular 5 round bolt BA anyway since i like them more and i got feeling they shoot faster, VG 1-5 is also not power creep in any way and is kinda weak to use but i like it though
you keep saying like this entire game is mathematically accurate and polished
this pic say otherwise , even when its BR 5 talk
1 Like
drags fingers over chalk board
i would like to remind the Class that Germany fights both Eastern (USSR) and Western Allies (US/UK) while the 43 at BR3 might be balanced for fighting the EA it is not balanced for BR3 against the WA
Which is why you listed all EA weapons yes we all know about how Enlisted favors Russia but
if you buff Germany you have to Buff US/UK then Japan
1 Like
How so? M1 Garand is pretty much equal to G43 in firepower. Only difference are reload speed + 2 less rounds which is nothing, but since you now don’t care about Germany suffering with slow reload why would i care about Americans having slow reload time? USA has also Johnson (with 10 rounds, they can buff reload speed a bit) so they can carry both of them which completely negates reload speed issue.
America also has overpowered M1907 while Germany has nothing. So where are you complaining about that? Yeah nowhere you only care when poor Americans are getting weaker.
Soviets are going to be soon fighting vs Japan, why is that issue of the balance not on your radar? Why the obsession with the Americans only?
3 Likes
ok Japan Can fight US only
and Germany fight USSR only
i bet you would feel the same way if the Garand suddenly had 13 round magazine
again stop acting like Germany only Fights Russia
as for a slight loading buff couldn’t you do the same thing for the 41 there the same gun when it come to reloading
the 1907 is not tech tree
1 Like