MKb 42(W) to Moscow Germany or remove PP by B. Shpitalny, 1940 from Moscow Soviet Union Now Moscow, Germany, as a whole, is at a disadvantage over the Soviet Union, Giving submachine guns only to the Soviet Union and not to the Germans is a serious loss of balance
11 Likes
They haven’t said what’s coming for axis in moscow. Maybe it’s another smg.
1 Like
I partially agree. They have to supply both axis and allies in Moscow with weapons of similar performance.
…Or some kind of WW1 Gewehr things.
Hahaha dont make us laugh… They did the same on tunisha. And if you look at the plans on nomandy the only good plan we dont have to pay for is JU188. They will never balance weponds or any thing…
historically the mkb 42 in none of its versions was in moscow, in none of its 2 existing models
in fact it is already appreciated that the germans can carry the assault mkb42 which is historically speaking incorrect
but in terms of balance it is a good addition, you can take 12 mkb if you are f2p or 16 mkb if you are premium (i prefeer 2 differet guns per soldier, 2 mp40, 1 kylay and 1mkb)
now, you have mkb42 W in moscow
2 Likes
›He thinks there is more
lol
lmao
We got what we got bro