Moscow balance is again MUCH towards German. Berlin is the next

Same argument could be said about t28 / pz4… t28 got what, 3 mgs firing at once? Pz4 got just 1, but has good HE. It’s asymmetrical yes, but I’m not ready to say one faction is absolutely better than the other when you take all the variables togheter :thinking:

The pz3s got two coax mgs…but a very poor canon, while t26 and sexy bt7 got only one… but have a gun that can take out all german tanks provided they aim. No side got the upper hand over all the campaign progression bar.

2 Likes

bt7 is the best tank in moscow change my mind

I certainly won’t! Bt7 is sexy and I love it. Gets you very fast where you need to be and got a great gun. Bt7 can shoot pz4 in the ass with ease (most of the time they are too busy shelling infantry to notice you coming)

Then there’s the t-50. Now… now that’s a Victoria secret’s model.

1 Like

BA-11 is chad.

2 Likes

Ahah, that thing surprised me more than once when I made the mistake of underestimating it. “What is th… pfff ahahah it’s just a sh*** armoured car, I can k… oh. It one shot me.”

1 Like

Pz-39 is virgin

I love how one argue’s around Tanks/Planes….who care’s about them, use your spawn/boots, flank! Soviets/Allies are actually OP end games on All campaigns. LTP

And dont forget the people who just come with

:clown_face:

1 Like

Yes :clown_face:

all campaigns? then why does germany gets an automatic rifle for everyone but assaulters and gunners, better mgs, and the ju-188 while america gets a wanna be smg, 2 BARs, a semi automatic garand for snipers with their only objectively OP piece of equipment being attackers that they can have either/or but not both and jumbo. yeah it doesn’t work if you actually think about :clown_face:

Can’t help ya if you don’t understand…USA Normandy is easy street! M2 is awesome if you know how to use it, Bar OP again user error if don’t get it, Tommy gun do I need to explain, attacking 75% of them me, two very good bombers vs one……??? You claim FG42 is awesome, I say not since you need ammo bags, I get two more grenades. MG42 is nice, again need ammo bags, I get two more explosive and slower/fast attack accuracy. Normandy is the definition of Allies dominance of three campaigns. Since you picked it, I see its a LTP issue or team problem

again it’s a wanna be SMG with awful sights, as much i love carbines i can’t pretend they are good because they simply are not, oh i do use carbine with only my assaulter and sniper not having carbines

op? when it has worse handling then mg34 as well as worse DPM

yet you can’t take out both but you can take out a fwk190 and a ju-188 oh the fwk190 has the same rocket that the bf110 just 1 less set

oh it use to have lmg ammo count since it was overlooked during ammo standardization though if it isn’t good then it wouldn’t hurt to give american troopers the BAR with of course reduced ammo

this is also due to ammo standardization where LMGs have 100 rounds or 2 mags which ever is greater, it just also happens that 42 and 34 have the 50 round mags which equals to 100 ammo.

And then there is Normandy where the Axis have very limited options to deal with an M4 let alone a Jumbo.
Normandy is such a strange campaign by the way. The early levels favor the Axis (while Puma is not unkillable for a Stuart, Puma definately has the upper had and the M8 Scott is straight garbage imo); Axis gets 2 good machineguns (FnaB and MP40) very early and while the Grease gun is good, they get jack all untill the shotgun;
then around lvl 15 it changes side to heavily favor the Allies with 500lb bombers and the M4’s which the Axis has either the gabage Sturmpistole to deal with or try and suicide with a Dynamite. For some reason the Panzers can’t pen the M4’s anywhere other than the backside which usually requires you to press into the enemy lines and flank or outmanouver the enemy tank (thankfully the Panzers are faster than the M4’s).
Also it’s so strange that I see so few people using mg’s in Normandy. Every other campaign is littered with mg42’s and such but not Normandy.

that’s strange since i was frontally penned by a 4j while i was in my m4a2 not that long ago?? though the germans do get a much better infantry weapons in the form of the fg42, i do hope that more better AT weapons gets added into normandy and they give the sturm the ability to go through 80mm of armor like it was meant to do irl

ВОт не надо заливать у меня топ немцы и топ советы, играю только на победу, самолеты что у той, что у той стороны бесполезны ( раз в 1.5 минуты делать 6-8килов, маааксимально бесполезно) на танке ты убьешь куда больше и принесешь больше пользы. АВС не уравновешан збшкой, зб кое-как конкурирует с свт. ПО поводу танков последний немецкий танк ВООБЩЕ неиграбелен ( играю только на 75мм) т.к. он не наносит урона пехоте и ясо для всех танков кроме т60. ПО поводу т28, ты издеваешься? ты выехжаешь и просто ВЫБРИВАЕШЬ ВСЕЕЕЕЕ, у немцев ничего похожего нет. В плане техники совки превосходят немцев ооооочень сильно, а вот пехота исключительно за счет пулеметчиков сильнее у немцев, по мне так баланс. Где нет баланса, так в Нормандии, там мне искренне жалко амеров

Всем Привет !!! Сорри, что в этой теме… Подскажите, КАК ЗАЛЕЗТЬ на крышу вокзала в Берлине!!! Устал уже искать…)))

I kill the jumbo with her learn of huse her bro

TNT, Ju-188, Me-110, anything in the side, both P-4’s though the MG port…

pretty much the equivalent to the options the allies have for dealing with P3’s and P4’s that are largely invulnerable to the US 75mm from the front.

3 Likes

M4s cannons struggle with Panzer IVs front. The Panzer IVs are able to pen the M4A2 through the front and the Jumbo thorugh the MG port (though its a bit bugged). You can pen them, especially the A2. Just learn to aim.
500lb are basically 250kg bombs and the German bomber has one more of it while the A20 has useless front MGs.
Sturmpistole is worse bit still able to kill Allied tanks.

PS: FnaB and MP are SMGs, not MGs.

2 Likes

ive ground to 14 in soviets, and was fully convinced german op, so i ground to 13 (as of last night) to germans.

Germans have much better bombs, but they have shit for weapons; the soviets get 20mm cannons that can easily OHKO the german planes and pen walls when striking, the germans get 7.92mm MGs that can take dozens upon dozens of close range hits to bring down the weaker soviet planes; the tradeoff is germans get better bombs and this definitely needs to be addressed as the german attackers are dominating invasions if the soviets dont mount any air defence. Soviet planes arent indestructable, you just have literally rifle shells and need to be pinpoint accurate to engines or pilots; ive brought down plenty of IL-2s with my stuka, and ive also taken down many stukas with my I-153.

However, tanks are very skewed to the russians. The BT-7 is a very mobile tank with trolly armor and is superior to the lumbering square mid model panzer iii and its weak af 3.7cm shells. The T-26 is just plain better than the early Panzer III. The late panzer is outmatched by the T-50’s armor and better AP shells, not to mention the mobility, and the 76.2mm HE is performing better than the 7.5cm. The T-28 may have less armor, but its also got 3 frontal machine guns and the crew to man them after sometimes 4 penetrations, if this tank is in a good position and covered by infantry it is an absolute monster and will easily outperform a pz IV E on infantry duty.

weaponry, the germans have the better rifles by far despite the soviets getting the sniper SVT-38 and unlocking some things earlier, but ive also had my teeth kicked in by someone rocking M91s, and ive kicked in plenty of teeth with Gewehr 33s. Smgs are a back and forth, the PPD 34 Box is ungodly superior to the MP-28, and the MP-38 is equal to the drum mag, sacrificing ammo pool and fire rate for stability, but ill give the MP40 its final credit. LMGS? while the MG34 is the best, you should keep in mind how difficult it is to mount LMGs. This means more often than not youre firing them from crouched or standing positions from the shoulder, and a heavy, uncontrollable rapid fire is a disadvantage here.

Put the german LMGs in a defensive posture where they can be mounted, and theyre superior. Take mounting away, and theyre inferior to the shoulder accuracy of the DP-27 (not nearly as uncontrollable in a 3 round burst as people claim, try using the MG-13 i dare you), Madsen and BAR. This is just a case of knowing your weapons and how to use them effectively.

The big thing youre missing here is where strengths lie; Moscow is a pain for germans because they are such a defense oriented army, but are almost always attacking on invasions. This forces german players to adapt and use their weapons in unintended roles to be effective- meaning when you actually put them into their intended roles, they will absolutely roflstomp the russians who dont go through this skill curve, the Madsen and DP-27 are basically a meta of semi auto rifles and no one can use them effectively as a result, the better tanks are put into defense nullifying their offensive capabilities, the PPD is the best offensive SMG but is only ever used for defense, and despite the king of defense the sniper SVT-38, nobody ever uses this weapon, let alone effectively. Its thrown in to the assaulter squad as an afterthought and nothing more.