AND OR
M15 Special
the M15 CGMC would be a great alternative at br1 able to deal with enemy tanks and be killed by them. In fact Both the CGMC and special remind me or a certain japanese tank.
like a certian German apc this would fit well into the game as neither being used as a tank nor APC.
I like the idea but then they would wind up being a Premium squad like the rest. It still irks me that the German halftrack is p Premium as it was a staple to the German army. I get why devs did that though since there isnāt a cap on APCs on the field like tanks. An organized team could spawn 2 tanks then a bunch of those and roll over objectivesā¦ironically like the Blitzkrieg in Poland.
These halftracks are not and should not be APCs. I can understand wanting to divide vehicles into different classes such as support vehicles and maybe in the future, but they are not transport vehicles
For the foreseeable future they would just be ātanksā
Now you are being ridiculous, it lacks armor, a turret itās open topped, has limited gun traversal, now you might have an argument for the limited number of tanks in game that fit that description completely, which if thatās an m4 fits none of that, also infantry must be carried internally, the251 is limited to ,4 soldiers.
First, the ātankā slot covers multiple vehicle types. Actual tanks, tank destroyers, self propelled artillery, anti-air, flamethrowers, etc
Second, my point is that the 251/9 and other specialized halftracks no longer explicitly ferried infantry squads so it shouldnāt be an APC.
Even if vehicles were diversified and overhauled in the future and halftracks would be separeted from actual tanks, these halftracks still would not be APCs because they were not explicit transport vehicles. They would just be in some side support slot
yes
no, as that can rotate, it would be an apc it only able to shoot forward thus having to turn the entire vehicle then yes apc did you not read the rules the 253 abides
no, again it one has more than one main weapon and two their arc of fire is 180 degrees and thus not limited
yes, no armor, no turret, limited arc of fire open top
i know you think you are being funny but you cant just break the rules that 253 applies
you should have pointed the spg we got last event
both have a big gun, open top, no armor and limit arc of fire you suck at this
also i dont want to add more vehicles slots thus vehicles unless they add more infantry slots, the infantry squad to vehicle ratio must be maintained this is not wathunder infantry is not to farmed for points. If you want all vehicles play warthunder
I said the colloquial ātank slotā covers multiple vehicle types. Iām not saying halftracks are tanks
I agree thatās why I want them to move the 251/9 to ātankā and all similar halftracks put there too, like the Panzerwerfer. With just 2 vehicle slots I donāt think itās that big of a deal what youāre bringing. Tank, tank destroyer, artillery, tank destroyer or artillery that happens to be mounted on a halftrack, etc
Rider and APC are more of an infantry squad
I disagree I do want all vehicles from Warthunder (WW2) and then some
i mean if you want more then 2 vehicles that are not
apcs, bikes, trucks or jeeps
that is vehicles that would have to be included as tanks unless they increase the number of infantry squads without making it unable to run on last gen consoles and pcs it can currently run on
armored cars, spgs, spaag, tank destroyers, tanks,
the 251/9 would have to go to br2 as a ātankā
because as a br3 tank it would be useless and people would demand compensation
the problem is people wasting one of two vehicle slots
or putting all of them at a br that does not fit
that is a lot of armored cars and spgs would be br2 against tanks
but might be br3 or 4 against infantry
i meant all vehicles as more than 2 per team playing at once, sorry it was me projecting some people want new vehicles classes for more vehicle slots