More Type 100 Smgs

As we all know the Type 100 Early and Type 100 Paratroopers were moved to BR2 and now Japan only has the S-100 in BR1 so we need more Smgs and variants of the Type 100 especially in BR1

Before starting the suggestions thanks to @_DELAVR for finding these Type 100 variants
Original post:Encyclopedia of Japanese small arms weapons

Type 100 prototype



Type 100 prototype is a prototype of the Type 100, has a shorter barrel and a longer bayonet bracket (bipods can also be put on the Type 100, which we have in the branch of pumping at rank 1).

Characteristics Type 100 Prototype:
|Rate of fire - (400—600?) / 530 rounds/min
|Weight - 3,5 kg
|Feed system - 30 round box

Type 100 prototype A



The Type 100 prototype A is a further modification of the prototype Type 100, the automatics were fixed and brought to a uniform rate of fire of 755 rounds per minute.

Characteristics Type 100 prototype A :
|Rate of fire - 755 rounds/min
|Weight - 3,5 kg
|Feed system - 30 round box

Type 100 prototype B


This is almost the final version of the Type 100, minor changes were made, such as reducing the length of the bayonet bracket. had a rate of fire of 755 rounds per minute, and in the pre-production model the rate of fire was adjusted to 700 rounds per minute. It was these pre-production models without a flash suppressor and with a bipod
Characteristics Prototype Type 100 B:
|Rate of fire - 700 rounds/min
|Weight - 3,5 kg
|Feed system - 30 round box

6 Likes

yes ! more japanese weapon ! but it’s not an smg it’s a javelin :joy:

2 Likes

There is some confusion in the description and characteristics of the weapon. The Type 100 B submachine gun (although it is more correct to call it Model 3 B) had a rate of fire of 755 rounds per minute, and in the pre-production model the rate of fire was adjusted to 700 rounds per minute. It was these pre-production models without a flash suppressor and with a bipod, as far as I know, that were sent to Burma.

1 Like

I also added a description of the development and prototypes to the Russian Wikipedia.

2 Likes

Ok I will edit

1 Like

I think the only one worth adding is the first one because it’s stats are different enough to set it apart.

1 Like