Actually is probable, if whe dont get an expansion toward paratroopers and mechanized infantry, for keep people grind i bet they release korea
Nah Iâm gonna stay deserting matches. Iâm not obligated to repeatedly push objective over and over for console Timmyâs and back of the map campers that treat cap like its made out of lava, just so in the end I can get shit XP for loosing.
2 Likes
would love cold war campaigns in Enlisted! Korea and Vietnam. I mean they already have the vehicles from War Thunder to just import
1 Like
Of course not, thatâs the obvious evolution⌠but I expected that to happen in a few years.
1 Like
1 Like
if anything they are the first to desert in matches
1 Like
As i remember, keofox only mentioned the squad slots so far and even that was only just a preliminary plan.
Well since 83â project is dead, rising storm 2 being completely forgotten by devs and not even on life support i wouldnât mind seeing Vietnam but they still need to release multiple maps with ww2 factions first, in 2-3 years i could see Vietnam and Korean war being a good idea for the next step in Enlistedâs lifecircle
^ plus we have some post ww2 vehicles in the editor
4 Likes
I guess this also counts for refunds for bronze orders spent for rank upgrades, especially Tier 2 and 3 soldiers?
1 Like
Weâre going to wait and see, then.
However, I am very much afraid that âtheoretically plausibleâ T-26 and BT-7 will appear in Berlin or âlow BRâ MP-3008 appearing in Stalingrad.
Personally I would wait in the queue as long as it takes to create an immersive match.
2 Likes
Those changes sound fun but I think we can only really see how it works out once the patch is out, however being able to queue up with someone playing the Americans while you play the UK might be possible too? That would be so awesome. I have like a friend who wants to play only Moscow so it might be fun if that was possible.
I am just slightly worried about them adding in Repair cost. Fingers crossed that doesnât happen. If it is confirmed to not happen please tell me so I can stop worrying.
The game however came really far and i am super happy about that change. Tbh maybe that means I can play Normandy without FG42s in there? It is not like they are that strong I just donât like it. I prefer Bolt Action / Semi Auto and would like that in Normandy too.
2 Likes
I agree. I even prefer âimmersive matchmakingâ over balanced at all.
I think the pacific campaign right now is the best one when it comes to that. It is so much fun to have the advantage of speed and being smaller as japan while the USA have the by far better equipment.
I would love group Banzai Charges like in Rising Storm but maybe that comes at some point?
2 Likes
How will paid content transfer over?
For example when it comes to premium squads, if there is one âUSSR armyâ then what will happen to the PPK-41 and the PPD-40 DSZ squads which so far have been separated. Will it be possible to have both equipped at the same time now potentially allowing multiple premium squads with those bonuses, or the M2 Hyde being able to be brought into the Pacific?
And what about the full access of the Stalingrad campaign, what will happen to those benefits which people paid for such as the increased XP, the extra squad amount etc considering there will simply be one army now? Will this approach be adopted in some way where people buy access and people who have already bought Stalingrad wont need to pay, or will there be compensation of some form?
How this is handled I feel will be very important as acting fairly and honourably will make people feel safer in investing in this game if they choose to do so.
3 Likes
same here donât mind waiting few minutes, usually never have longer queues than 10-20 secs. I donât see that as problem
2 Likes
I higly doubt compensation at all. It will count as expired and used content. We will get bronze orders converted to silver with like 10 bronze for a 1 silver one, that is how I see it happen.
I wonder how you solver the historical Squads? In a specific campaign you put Squads that were there. Now what Squads we get to keep? or you remover all and make new? I donât get this at all. say germany, 5 campaigns x 3 different Assaulter Squads (Assaulter I,II,III) -1 for Stalingrad only 2 so 14 different Squads now merged into 1 ââcampaignââ sort of, and which of those 14 Squads will be the new Assaulter I,II,III Squads? or we keep Squads we have and just choose ? or different Squads of Assaulter I now becomes 1 Squad and you just randomly pick one? And what of historical context here? I guess you donât care at all? before was nice little text about why in that campaign bla bla, now is out of context? And Premium Squads we also keep? eqipping as many we want? or capped at say 8 normal Squads and 2 premium whatever? and btw how many slots for Squads in this new ââSetââ you talk about??
That seems pretty selfish of you.
Most games with teams have penalties for quitting mid match for a good reason. It is impossible to balance a game where half a team leaves just because they are losing.
I hope you never complain about your teammates when you just made it clear that their gaming experience does not matter to you.
3 Likes
I strongly disagree with punishing deserters
There are gamemodes me and my friends strongly dislike, conquest. We desert all conquest maps because it gives almost 0 xp, matches last do short they are really bad for bonus
Also sometimes you get matches that see impossible to win, if you stay you only get slaughtered and its not fun. Ie playing Pacific allies 7 of my team is bots. Its instant lose, why would you punish me for staying?
If you keep the change allow ppl to desert if not enough real players on 1 team, and allow people to choose gamemodes. This should only be enforce when both teams have max human players
A team with bots is put in a massive disadvantage. And we shouldnât be punished because of it. We already lose ranks, xp penalty and time
Also what will happen to 5 star soldiers then if ranks dissolve will we get compensation
5 Likes
I donât get the huge fuss over people wanting more historical accuracy in a WWII game.
Keofox calling those people âdissentersâ, when by definition, they are not. Not from what Iâve seen on the board, at least. And, âA willing player plays or sits silently and waits for the release of new productsâ as if he would rather not have people voice their opinions.
And then Keofox liking posts calling the Enlisted community âspoiledâ, and âcryingâ, and âtoxicâ, for voicing their opinions. And that it is, âtheir problemâ, and that they should just go, âplay a different gameâ.
It is so very disrespectful to fans of the game.
5 Likes