More Italian weapons for the sex appeal, If they add this it might get more people to play Tunisia then play now beside more guns more rifles is always good.
Any other Italian weapons you want rifle preferred post here.
6 Likes
I donāt know about sex appeal but Tunisia needs more love and more weapons for that campaign.
3 Likes
If the Battle of Moscow had MKB, there is no reason why the Battle of Tunisia did not
And why were there no Tiger tanks in the Tunisian campaign?
2 Likes
at this point since Berlin has the AS44 thereās no point that Tunisia shouldnāt have magical weapons as well.
2 Likes
No offense, but I donāt think more copy and paste will help Tunisiaās Axis player numbers. There needs to be a reason to grind Tunisia axis. More Italian equipment could be the reason.
1 Like
There are too few players in the Italian camp largely because their weapons are worse than those of the Allies.
Moreover, the Tiger tank did appear in the Battle of Tunisia in history, so there is no reason why it should not appear.
Also itās good to avoid copy-pasting, but you have to accept that this game has mined most of the commonly used weapons from WWII history
Over-obsession with blueprint weapons and failure to mass-produce weapons is not necessarily a good thing. AS44 is an example. They may look different in appearance, but the data is still copied and pasted.
As long as players keep saying āhey this isnāt fairā, game changes will have to move towards āfairā weapon stats
What we end up with is a situation similar to āBattlefieldā, everyone uses similar weapons, they just look different.
If the Italian army had MP43 and Tiger tanks I would choose to play Italy
1 Like
I love that this comment just confirms what I always say about axis players only playing campaigns they have wunderwaffen.
Talking about blueprint and failure to mass produce and suggesting Tiger and MkB on the same text, thatās new level of hypocrisy.
Donāt worry, eventually Firefly and the Tiger will face each other over there, but the campaign has more than enough and very strong weapons for the axis as of now.
2 Likes
I will only play the camp with stronger weapons. The current environment in Tunisia can prove that many players have the same idea as me.
Because a game is a game, not a test. Even if you use worse weapons to defeat the enemy, what will you get?
1 Like
Just because one person is content with copy-pasted assault rifles and tigers. Doesnāt mean the entire Axis player base is, lol. Mr Kambodscha_Pol Pot does not speak for every person that plays axis.
2 Likes
I respect your opinion, but I see no reason to play Tunisia for another copied gun or tank.
2 Likes
As a vested beneficiary of the Allied Powers, you can continue to use the British army to kill Italian BOTs. Insufficient blueprint weapons will not help the Italian army reverse its disadvantage.
Just like I am now using the Moscow Soviet army to massacre the German BOT
The Allies had been in a dominant position for so long that they were afraid of change, even if it was just a small change.
You yell āNo, copy and paste will ruin this gameā
In fact, what you are thinking in your heart is āLetās continue killing BOTā
Of course, I donāt want the Italian army to get the MP43. How about we give the Italian army the Breda PG? It can fire four bursts and its performance should be close to G.43Kurz
Satisfy your curiosity
1 Like
If you donāt want to copy and paste, you may have to rely on this game to do the Cold War campaign.
Most of the weapons used in World War II have almost been produced.
If you continue to mine blueprint weapons, it will not bring any changes to this game. Berlin is still dominated by the FG42-2 and AVT. The more blueprint weapons you produce will just look fancy at best.
for one there are countless variants they could add or weapons from minor powers (countries) we have not seen yet including their weapons even if it would be too much to add them as squadās or factions.
2 Likes
Then maybe play them moreā¦ or at all and not just Allies all the time.
the TZ-45 could be a tech tree weapon while this wooden stock version could be a premium squad version
(for the rest Italy has a lot of SMGs so that sector is not a problem)
1 Like
As far as I know, there is a game called āWorld of Warshipsā that keeps digging for non-existent āblueprintsā and equipment.
When they had almost completed the existing World War II warships, they began to continuously dig out drawings of warships.
So much so that the game is filled with so many ānon-existentā drawings of warships that it is even difficult to see historical warships.
Do we really want the game to be like this?
By then the battlefield will be filled with a large number of unheard of blueprint weapons, such as tanks like KV.6, G.43kurz, or GBD-79
It does look fancy, but I donāt think itās a good thing
1 Like
Breda PG
I had high hopes for it a year ago. It might be able to change the problem of poor Italian weapons.
Itās a pity that I havenāt been able to see it yet
Whatās interesting is that it can fire four times in a row. I guess its performance should be similar to or even better than g.43kurz.
The sad thing is that g.43kurz has been around for so long, but it still hasnāt appeared.
3 Likes
one most nations cannot build donāt need warships,
Warships
Tanks-Fighters
Guns
Whatās that the scaling of what it takes to build your own there are far more countries that can build their own guns, they donāt use blueprint weapons because they have too they do it because they want to as they are often overpowered better weapons they can more easily sell,
Someone pushed all the scarecrow arguments it knows on this one.
I am not the one going around complaining about a single gun added to a campaign that is factually weaker than ones that already exist on it.
I am not the one who only plays campaigns where unicorn equipment appears.
I am not even against the Tiger appearing in Tunisia.
More than half the matches i played recently are outside Moscow and Tunisia and you are free to check it up.
Moscow isnāt soviet bot farm (at least not on the North America server) for a long time there are very competent axis teams playing there.
I hear the axis player whining about weak equipment since the T-28 was the highest level unlock and the PPSh didnāt existed on the campaign yet.
Cope with the fact that the allied main playerbase arenāt nearly close to whining as much as the axis player base about stuff completely normal.
Tunisia has as much capable equipment for both sides, equipment isnāt the reason they donāt play there.
1 Like
In addition to the Moscow battle Soviet army that I am still leveling now
All other battles have been maxed out
I donāt know who youāre talking about, itās not me