Okay no talks mate, germuney suferz.
While most smgs, including mp43, doesn’t need that. And sometimes it’s not possible.
S u f f e r s
u
f
f
e
r
s
Ok retard. Stg and fedorov are balanced too then.
1 Like
Then I don’t care about difference as I can just spam grenades, and I can do that since the 4th level.
Grenades solve any problem. Fg? Mg? Ppsh? I throw a grenade. Boom.
But why even caring about guns then?
Never got that. Granades aren’t as good as you claim they are. At least not outside the cancer of berlin.
Still, being cancer by taking advantage of bugs and exploits isn’t a viable way to balance things imo.
Developed, but never saw service in ww2. Just like the IS-3 or T-44.
I mean, I myself asked for a damage buff for the STG alone. And I believe that was quite a popular opinion on here.
The devs are soviet-biased af so it’s sadly likely.
You have a semi switch for range. And the high hp allows you to use that effectively.
And soviets have AVS and AVT. The correct option was to put out the fire by removing all of these things (and balancing smgs). Unfortunately, the devs don’t see it this way.
1 Like
Losing a conversation and start insulting okay 
-
First you started this wen i joked with the news of more ak47
-
second i have my opinion and for someone with the 80% of win rate with soviet in berlin i can say for sure soviet are OP and i have all faction completed so im sure wen i say soviet are OP and dont need an ak47 in berlin
-
third last but not less important i sayed my honest opinion you not, so i have to understand what From what you sayed and from is ended your last messagge: “i like shit meta spam and 0 faction balance” is this you like?
2 Likes
Yeah I know that “buff my side u damn devs” is a popular opinion. But it’s quite an irrelevant opinion lol.
Of course. But we play a game. This game. And talking about the current situation. So as a new to campaign but not to the game, I’ll just spam grenades and won’t have problems with bad equipment. The only thing I’ll care about is my team, and both teams usually consist of people with skin darker than a black hole. And they can’t counter both fedorov or fg with their starter guns.
I heard that since I was playing WT. I even thought like that… Before I tried both german and soviet tech trees.
Guess what my opinion was after that.
Fedorov is 2hk at range, just as stg. And stg can be easilly used at distance in auto mode without laying down.
T-34 is ok because germans got Pz3J1.
Fedorov is ok because germans got mp43.
It’s not an equivalent, it’s good, but not even close to the cancer level of FG.
Incorrect opinion because devs won’t do that.
Dude your argument is literally GERMANY SUFFERS.
I won’t argue with this. Okay, it suffers. Weakest faction. Buff plz. No good guns. Suffer so much, can’t play.
So am I. And I say that berlin is balanced. Main problem of berlin is always players, not equipment.
1 Like
Didn’t noticed, poor language level sorry. Still, it’s a forum, everybody has their personal opinions, and here we are arguing about who’s more right and who’s less wrong. My opinion is that AS or RD won’t change the balance at all, and we don’t need them not because SoViEtS OP but just because I don’t want this game become WT with weird prototypes everywhere. If I wanted ww2 laserguns, i’d be playing Wolfenstein.
1 Like
It’s realistic. It should kill in 1 shot. And should act similarly to it’s counterpart. Fact is, the fedorov shouldn’t be there and the STG should’ve came out much, much earlier. So the least the devs could do is make the guns of similar strengh rather than adding a fantasy soviet gun and making it op to make sure the germans can’t possibly become the dominant faction outside of Normandy, because “our glorious soviet union can’t possibly ever lose to the nazis”.
Yes, let’s emrace the cancer. Still tohugh, I don’t see how nades are so op. Definitely aren’t in Moscow.
Racist?
Well ,I also play warthunder, more than this game actually and the situation there is severly different. The trees are balanced by favouring one side at perticular brs. For example (in ground rb) the soviets are stronger at 3.3-4.0, while the germans are better off at 5.3-6.0. (god I fricking hate panthers).
Not realistically. The fedorov is 2x as accurate, which leads to a higher chance of hitting a high vale body part. So realistically, at range fedorov is 2-3, while STG is 3-4.
So can fedorov. Just a matter of skill.
Good instances of the axis getting screwed over.
It is as good. The only real difference is 5 rounds in magazine. AVT is much more accurate and can therefore hit at range, while FG has slightly lower recoil.
Both are as viable at short range. Quick double tap on semi is all you need.
3 Likes
Fedorov has full-length rifle cartridge, for you to know.
N
I
Devs aren’t russians. Latvia isn’t a part of Russia yet, as far as I know.
And again, it’s a game milked by gaijin. They don’t care about someone’s honor, great reich, saint eagles of democracy or glorious soviet soldiers.
They make money. That’s all.
Still there’s an insane amount of players whining about russian bias and suffering germany.
You know what they do? They find a hill near their spawn and sit there, not playing objectives, not doing impact, not pushing. But when they lose it surely ain’t their fault. 3.7 kd on Panther F btw. I hated germany players so much while I was grinding german tanks.
So after that I’m completely immune to all “germany suffers”, “russian bias” and whatever else.
You can make headshots, so stg is a 1hk gun. Can’t? Skill issue.
Okay. Stuka got 250 kg bombs, but pe-3 has more 100kgs, so it’s ok.
Tiger is better than IS-1 in literally anything, but soviets, uhm… It’s ok, anyway.
2 times lower. That’s not slightly. For a full-cartridge gun it has literally zero recoil.
Thing is they are not OP, they have real players and not bots. Equipment wise Berlin is the most balanced campaign in the game.
1 Like
Breathtaking
2 Likes
Not really. It’a a very small rifle cartridge. It’s closer to an intermediate than an actual full carteidge. As for which is more damaging, I’ve had a conversation about than on here. The thread ended with like 200 replies and no clear conclusion. So I’m not going down that path again.
Still it’s very clear the devs are pro-russian. The way they act is enough evidence. And a lot of their company members are in russia. Plus they started off in Russia.
At this point, I’m pretty sure you can’t take a joke. Cause those are very common jokes in warthunder.
Unfortunately they are very much reality in Enlisted.
Nagant 1895 can 1 shot. Very op, needs immediate nerf.
Ok, not even comparing the correct counterparts. Which would be IL-2 vs Stuka. Where IL-2 is superior. It’s on par with the 110 for best plane in Moscow.
Ah yes, you got a worse level once.
Let’s list a few other instances where germany gets screwed:
MP40 vs PPD drum/PPS
pre-war kar scoped vs scoped SVT
Panzer3s vs their counterparts
G41 vs SVT
ZH vs AVS
MP35 vs PPSh41/PPD40
Berreta (20r) vs PPSh (71r)
VG1-5 vs PPD
I could keep going
2 Likes
1 Like
Again, talking about commercial projects, I don’t believe in any kind of bias. And if anyone starts talking about russian/german/murican/etc bias, I just stop taking his opinion seriously.
IL is superior in killing planes. But that’s not what attackers are made for. So I rarely see soviet planes except the most “noob” ones.
Oh so it’s different. Le classique.
It’s not a joke too often.
In terms of being a sniper rifle svt is worse.
And let’s say then:
DP vs mg34, dpm vs mg42, dt vs mg34-75
Avs vs fg-42, avt vs fg-42-2
Il-2 vs stuka, il-10 vs fw
T-34 vs panther, is-1 vs tiger, is-2 vs tiger 2.
You don’t believe in bias as long as soviets are more powerful. If the germans became stronger, you’d be crying about german bias all over the place. That’s how it works with the likes of you.
The IL can keep attacking ground while making sure a stuka never gets to do more than a single suicide run. Plus, it’s superior at dealing with infantry, as it’s rockets allow it to constantly keep a presence over the battlefield, rather than a stuka that drops a bomb and either dies or has to fly for 5 minutes to rearm.
Cuase you got the short end of the stick once. Germany does so all the time.
it is. You probably just can’t understand it most of the time.
In terms of game meta sniping is useless.
Scoped SVT is one of the most effective weapons in Moscow.
The difference isn’t too huge. Personal prefernce imo.
There I’d give it to the DT. Imo the 75r mg34 is worse than the basic one, due to sight impairment.
Much closer than AVS vs ZH.
IL-2 all the way.
Quite equal. Very close at least.
Makes sense given the starting T34 vs Pz4 matchup.
Honestly, ignoring the fact that the IS-1 is only a minor upgrade over the T34s, the matchup is fairly balanced. Anti-infantry is similar and both can pen each other easily.
1 Like
Wow, salty.
I play all factions. In berlin too. And I hate all %faction-name% mains equally.
Its rockets are dogshit. RBS-132 are good, RBS-82 - meh.
Who “me”? Retarded much?
I don’t main any faction or any side, again. I play all of them.
God dammit, you’re really the eversuffering one.
If that’s an unironical post like NERF X DEVS STUPID MUH RUSSIAN BIAS with author seriously arguing in comments why his side suffers from evil ruskis - then it’s probably not.
Closer. But still a huge difference.
I prefer having the ability to kill tanks easilly.
One gets slightly better manouverability, second gets 3 bomb loads and very good 30mm cannons that shred infantry.
It’s basically a downgrade. Worse armor, worse mobility.
There’s such thing as angling. You angle your hull in your weak and suffering tiger, and bravo, 85 mm guns don’t penetrate you.
Tiger 1 basically has better armor against 85mm guns than tiger 2 does. But if you don’t know and don’t understand that (or you probably ignore that), then what should I talk with you about?
Well said…
And thats basicly over 90% of ‘weapon balance’ converstation in forum.
1 Like
Yup.
Probably the relevant discussion could happen only when player is asking to nerf his side.
Nah, RBS-82 are fine. I myself can’t use them against tanks too well, but they’re very good against infantry and you get 8 of them. And they killed my panzer 4 a few times, so they definitely can kill tanks.
Where do you find that about warthunder? Never came across stuff like this.
A small one.
Well, thing is, the russians don’t need a plane to kill tanks. They have tanks with good enough guns to take care of that. So planes don’t have to suicide into tanks and can focus of softening up thep oint as they should.
The IL gets better manuverabillity and bombs. 2x250 is better than 1x250 + 4x50.
Also, a single 30mm. The 2 23s are also good.
So in the end, IL is more manuverable and has better bombs, while the FW is faster. Guns are down to preference basically. I’d say it’s balanced.
Mobillity doesn’t matter much in Berlin and armor is strictly better. Sure, it doesn’t make a huge difference, but saying the IS has worse armor is just downright false.
Sure, yo ucan angle, but not many people do, and even then, it’s much harder to do so in Enlisted than in warthunder. Since you basically have to get a near perfect angle to be able to bounce fro mboth your front and side. And as opposed to warthunder, in Enlisted you have limited visibillity, so you’re voulnrable to getting flanked, and just a little bit of a flank is enough to get rid of your angle. Plus in Enlisted players have the ab reticle, so they won’t hesitate to shoot becuase ‘it might be too angled’ and will simply see green. Same with the mantlet, where in warthunder oyu don’t shoot it cause it’s very trolly, but in enlisted is possible to pen, becuase aiming reticle.
2 Likes
They can kill tanks (but only pz2/pz3b are easy targets). But against infantry they suck, unless someone’s spotting it for you.
On WT forums.
Huge one dude.
And germans definitely need. Wait, they have good tanks and AT weapons lol. That’s just a very good addition.
And also, imagine newbie meeting angling tiger. He won’t be able to kill it without a plane.
Single drop of 250kgs. No matter how much of them actually, result is almost the same. So it’s one drop of 250 kg vs one drop of 250 kg and two drops of 50 kg. Have you, like, ever played il-10?
Stop pretending to be oppressed even when you have an advantage.
30s work against infantry much better, and they often annihilate planes.
You surely are a bad WT player.
There’s no projection where IS-1 can’t be penetrated in the hull by Pz4’s gun, no matter how it will angle. But there are such projections for T-34, where only ring and turret are penetrable.
Better mobility = better detpack dodging.
You know what? SKILL ISSUE. If people don’t do that then that’s their problem. They have the ability and I don’t care if they will use it or not.
It’s berlin. Sometimes there’s no place to flank because the map is a single street or you have to cross the bridge first.
Also tiger player can be not retarded.
In the future, more weapons may be added to combat Stg44. Because fully upgraded fedorov is equal to the upgraded Fg42. Only 5 stars, just having more spare magazines. Plus, in most of Berlin, there are only narrow spaces, making it quite difficult to use for me. 