Modern conflict

Suggestions
1

make modern conflict not an event, but a 5th campaign pls it was super great

1 Like
2

Not going to lie, I personally hated it. Not saying its bad, per say, but it was very much not the sort of game play I was looking for in enlisted. All the weapons were just so damn powerful it felt like a totally different game. Also I don’t think the engine can really handle tanks with that much turret rotation. X.X

But eh, to each their own, I guess.

6 Likes
3

no, it was decent at best with more deserving thing existing like the pacific front and the korean war

3 Likes
4

god no please

5 Likes
5

I think it will eventually happen, but few years from now, same was for War Thunder, it was supposed to be up to year '60 and now is way beyond that.

6

Makeing it a recurring event is the only compromise I will accept (Especially when they do it every time a modern FPS game is released). Enlisted should stay mainly a WW2 shooter, with maybe Korea as far outside as it gets.

4 Likes
7

Play BF4

2 Likes
8

Pacific campaign first. I want japanese weapons versus american weapons.

1 Like
9

Sidenote: No like seriosuly play it, it"s a great game unlike Enlisted and fits your criteria, it’s no BF5

10

I would preferred not. Give it to another studio and make it its own game. Leave enlisted as a WW2 game.

11

realistically speaking it’s probably coming. If the event was any indication of how it will play I hope completely reevaluate it because I didn’t enjoy it.

I’d rather see the korean war, the winter war, Russo-Japanese war, Invasion of Poland, Invasion of France. The first French Indochina war would be a great setting.
image

1 Like
12

If this game also follow War Thunder steps, surely they’ll come sooner or later when they’re done doing WW2. personally I think it’s quite fun too

The engine is the same as War Thunder, tho. If WT can do it, so can Enlisted

13

Korea would be bomb af

1 Like
14

It’s a ww2 game now.

I hope it will go ww1 and Vietnam for example one day.

15

I’m just speaking from my personal experience using the tanks in that mode, where my aim jittered all over the damn place all the time, which was unpleasant and hadn’t happened with any of the other vehicles in the game.

16

yeah, probably because rushed event/lack of fine tuning. but Dagor engine shouldn’t be the problem

1 Like
17

Korea would be ideal, not only because it’s so criminally underdone in games, but just for the sheer number of nations involved.

Only downside would be overlapping WW2 equipment.

1 Like
18

that downside would likely be worth it for the devs since they don’t need to create as much new things

1 Like
19

This would split the game playerbase even more. TBH, I’d rather want devs to improve, fix bugs and polish this game.

2 Likes
20

The problems with adding a lot of these conflicts are:

  1. Weapons. They’d get reppetitive real quick and you’d end up with basically the Enlisted equivalent of Warthunder China/Isreal, where 95% of content is copy paste.
  2. Playerbase fracturing. The playerbase isn’t exactly increasing. Adding more campaigns would only fracture it further to the point where in some of the less liked ones you’d be lucky to meet more than 2 real players in a match.

Honestly, I’d say there’s only space left for 2 or so more ww2 era conflicts in this game, one of which being Japan vs USA.
Later, I could see Enlisted expanding to Korea, potentially Vietnam or even WW1, as those conflicts could get more people into the game.

1 Like