Wherever I look for information about MKb 42 it seems like the Walther (W) version had higher RoF than Heanel (H).
600 and not 500.
I suggest you to change this, unless you’re planning to move these rifles down one BR, to IV.
Despite the lower dispersion, (W) performs noticeably worse than (H) in any aspect.
This change could maybe make it stand out more?
id rather nerf them if necessary and move down in BR.
Having them all as 1 massive cluster fk in BR5 makes most of them obsolete as its relatively easy to just grind the stg44 and skip the rest of them.
According to Vickers Tactical it’s 500
Meaning we may have conflicting information about it.
I really like the STG45 and the Mkb42(W) but the STG44 is just the superior choice. The MKb42s and the STG45 should be BR4 honestly (with balance adjustments as necessary)
Honestly - the main issue with those slow rate of fire ARs is that they aren’t noticeably more accurate than STG44 which already is a laser accurate rifle - or at least recoil wise…
If they buffed the slow rate of fire STGs by having even less recoil I can absolutely see people using them.
That being said, MKBs are historically speaking firing with an open bolt - for non gun nerds: that means they are inherently less accurate than closed bolt guns - like the STG for example.
So all MKBs and even the sniper version deserve an accuracy nerf and respectively should move to BR4.
Well first they’d need to fix their accuracy system as some guns that were about 1-2 MOA shoot at like 5-8 MOA, which is just insanely bad
The MKb 42(H) fired from a tilting open bolt and was striker-fired, while the too complex MKb 42(W) fired from a rotating closed bolt and was hammer-fired.
(H) showed better reliability and overall performance, but (W) showed better single-shot accuracy.
The Heanel version was later however re-designed to fire from a closed bolt and be hammer-fired; which became MP43/1.
Agreed.
I would really like to see a slight nerf and moved down to BR IV.
Oh yeah true- forgot about that
