That’s a good idea and the best class for it
1 Like
True, but I feel like Engineers is the only logical existing class for that ability,
That might be the best way to implement something like that without creating a whole new class
1 Like
Mines had their time but go to hell with them.
They are flawless. Mines require no skill and time, and even if players see them, the bots wont see them at all. They require ammo or in worst case grenades to get rid off and even have no FF on for the deployer to trigger and as everything else on Enlisted there is no class or number limit.
At least FLAGGOTs need to pay for slots to crash into the ground.
From historical prespective, probably yes.
But from gameplay perspective it’s probably one of the worst.
From historical pov, engineers should also be the only ones to deploy mines.
2 Likes
Is it cool if we leave the homophobia out of the thread, I’m straight but I’m sure other player ain’t and the all caps FLAGGOTs is a little in your face
From a historical perspective there should be no AI, as it wasn’t invented yet in WW2
1 Like
? Why should it be against homosexuals? I think they are better pilots than FLAGGOTs.
And video games were not invented either.
1 Like
No shit sherlock Im just fucking with you
Let’s keep the conversation civil, yeah?
minesweeper class?
2 Likes
Oh the flashbacks!
Look I’m the last person anyone would ever call woke, but cmon dog, the comment didnt even make sense in the context you used it.
You we’re directing it towards me as an insult, which idgaf but like idk choose a more inclusive insult
Imagine if someone didn’t like people who dig (verb) trenches, and then said they could stand that word but used it as a plural noun and in all caps, (I’m not gonna say it bc I don’t wanna get banned but you get my point, I’m lightskinned black too so I get a little more leeway)
Look im not gonna flag the comment to the mods, because I’m not a bitch/snitch but yeah kinda lame of you
Yeah my bad, tbf Captain called me a [quote=“CaptainSebekel, post:23, topic:147105”]
FLAGGOTs
[/quote] in a round about way, and that was kinda annoying
but you’re right i’ll pump the breaks
1 Like
Wow. No wonder this idea is dumb.
Man, Americans have no humor.
Are you a suicide pilot and also proud of it? If so, yes you are a FLAGGOT. If not, you are not a FLAGGOT. I think even Americans can understand this.
Is this actually something people use to describe it?
I’ve never heard of it but theres alot of shit I dont know.
If you or someone can verify that it is then I take that back
this word comes from name of one certain forum member that is avid enjoyer of suicide tactics (flaggothree or flagg03).
1 Like
I have brought this up many times and so have many others… the AI in Enlisted is mediocre at best and I would expect with technology where it is and having seen the AI in other first person shooters. A good example is Counter Strike 2. The AI in that not only has levels of difficulty but the AI is very smart and moves a lot like humans and when set to the hardest difficulty it truly is just that DIFFICULT. Maybe they should look at the way they have utilized that AI engine and take notes but what I still don’t understand is why the developers wont devote a significant amount of time and dedication to reworking and drastically improving the AI across the board. If they would do that they would find that it would improve player base and game longevity. One of the issues is players crying,complaining and pitching a meta tantrum on developer forums about game AI when really their gaming skills are sub par but as a result developers have reservations about improving game AI because they know that AI technology today would outperform humans most of the time and if nobody wins their player base will dwindle quickly. I say all this to say that whatever the developers decide to do they should try to keep in right in the middle.