Some body did write under a You tube Video about enlisted
This is not a game about WWII anymore, but a real freak show.
I think Enlisted did jump the shark a bit!
Thats the reason that it would maybe a good thing to have a Game mode that is more historicall and more authentic and be better seperated from merge!
Do somebody think the same, or hase some body a opinion about that topic?
If the Game mode would be more historicall then maybe it would be end a bit one sided then it would be maybe a good idea that the weaker side gets something like a Handicap (Golf) advantage?
19 Likes
so included in unauthentic t20 and hyde 44, m2 carbine
along with scoped ars and sfs
and all ars but the stg44
and move the fg42 to paratroopers
or just prototypes so german mains can wank
3 Likes
I think i depends!
For Example no Stg 44 in Stalingrad and Tunesia and Battle of Moscow!
But Maybe in the Battle of Berlin some STG 44 and maybe some Battles in the Rhineland maybe if Battles about the Rhineland maps get added!
And all Prototypes in the most cases no way!
If this would maybe go my way the player wouldnt much have to chose anyways!
But maybe there could be mode map specific units to play!
2 Likes
If English wikipedia is Correct Quote , hese converted M1/M2 select-fire carbines saw limited combat service in Europe, primarily during the final Allied advance into Germany. In the Pacific, both converted and original M2 carbines saw limited use in the last days of the fighting in the Philippines.[26]
If for example the end of the Pacific war is recreated or latest battles in germany then some small number would be maybe acceptabel
2 Likes
Making historically accurate modes needs a whole new match-making system - you can’t just have a certain number of slots and any squad is worth the same as any other squad.
For example a German rifle squad in 1941 with a MG-34 would need to “cost” more than a Soviet militia squad with only Mosins.
2 Likes
It would be nice to have a separate arcade mode and a realistic mode, but I’m not sure if there are enough players to support more game modes…
6 Likes
Could go about this suggestion in the way of making something like monthly events where each month would be a different campaign with a progression system but the next month could be a different one, etc
1 Like
Wow… it’s like the answer to all of this is staying in low BR
or just accepting the fg42 as is is as much bull as the t20
what the hell are you talking about… this sounds like massive cope
FG42 Was a rifle issued en masse to elite paratroopers… t20 was a pure experimental weapon.
Granted getting 9 man rifleman squads with them is bs but still.
1 Like
yes paratroopers not riflemen/infantry and if it was limited to paratroopers i would demand the m2 moved to assault the hyde 44 removed along with the t20 from the tech tree but its not
1 Like
there are no TT paras and by the time US landed france the so called paras were mostly used as infantry.
Except only some thousands of these were issued
most of them to
82nd & 101st Airborne Divs
and some limited issues to
4th & 29th Infantry Reg
2 Likes
what does that have to do with th 2000 fg42s and 4000 fg42 2s made its a paratrooper weapon, if not for its inclusion as ain infantry weapon other sf would not be needed so long as any sf exists in any mode all sf deserve to exist in said modes
2 & 6k actually. ( More than M2’s )
The very limited issuing of M2 was mostly done to airborne units.
So with what logic M2 becomes regular assaulter weapon while FG42 is paywalled behind para squad?
1 Like
ok in europe the m2 is a paratrooper weapon and infantry in pacific, just stop acting like the fg42 should be an infantry weapon, or just make both the fg42 and m2 paratrooper weapons. and we need a tech tree paratrooper squad one of them only one
quite sure its infantry weapon due to lack of TT paras and because of avs,avt,t20
yes the fg42 as an infantry weapon is as fake/real as the t20
and 2k and 6 k are production numbers not issued numbers dont compare the two
While over 6 million M1 Carbines were produced during World War II, the fully automatic M2 version was adopted late in the war, with official production starting in October 1944 and continuing into early 1945, yielding an estimated 217,500 M2 Carbines before war’s end. These M2s were manufactured by Inland and Winchester for the most part.
either all sf avs,avt,t20 fg42s belong or none of them do
one actually used, paratroops mostly used as infantry at that point of war.
One never leaving proto stage and never issued anywhere.
Sounds about right.
Cant really figure a single logical reason why they would shelf such gun but do tell me.
Produced & Issued apparently is the same ?
germany produced 2000 fg42s earlier in the war most may have been issued not so much for the 6000 fg42 2s
they were destroyed in transport or at marshaling yards like a lot of weapons before they reached froth lines
look at the percentage of weapon the allies lost to u-boats now switch sunk on ships by submarines to blown apart by bombs on trains.
germany produced 500 000 stg44s if anything more than 10 percent of them reached soldiers hands almost every soldier would have had one by wars end
the stg44 would have been more common than the gw41 100 000 or gw43 400 000
- Production of the FG 42‑2/Type G: approximately 5,000–6,500 units, with some sources citing up to 6,000
- Exact issuance numbers remain undocumented in the available sources.
- It’s highly likely that a majority of the produced Type G rifles were issued, given their intended frontline deployment by late-war Fallschirmjäger units—but we simply don’t have concrete figures.
Germany deployed approximately 425,000 to 450,000 StG 44 (Sturmgewehr 44) rifles during World War II.
Most StG 44 rifles produced were issued to troops, but exact figures remain uncertain. Historians estimate roughly 80-95% of production saw frontline service.
and probably was.