No, I say team based. Every stack is a team but not every team is a stack.
When I say stack I mean the people in a lobby queuing up together.
When I say team I mean the 10 people fighting the 10 people.
Stacks can communicate with VC, teams are not guaranteed that without being in a stack themselves.
No, ofc it wouldn’t be like battlefield. We don’t have an ingame VC, it’d be so pointless as these are very different games.
No comment. You know exactly what I have meant. This is ridiculous.
You are just anti fair-play and anti healthy game environment guy. The type that will do anything to get a slightest advantage over others in very casual game that requires very low skill.
I hope I will never encounter you in match, it’s going to be insta desertion for me. I definitely do not want to play with guys that do have such a mindset.
Gn
So you want to make the game more casual by lowering the number of friends you can play with…?
I really need you to say what you have said out loud and slower. If neither matter then we need no matchmaking at all. We have an equipment based MM, by your logic Enlisted is an equipment dominant game regardless of other factors.
That’s not sounding right at all. I know both of us disagree on that.
Regardless of the rest of the same accusation you keep throwing around despite ignoring me refuting or explaining how that’s not always the case. You have saids it’s about all 20 players? Why does less stacks help 20 players play better together in a game with no VC?
Could you answer why stacks are toxic? You say it then never elaborate, and anything good I bring up about it you ignore.
Please tell me the English isn’t your first language…
I’m all for removing BR 3 from the 1-2 MM. (That’s a loss of an advantage considering I play BR 3 often)
I play both in stacks of every size and solo. Most of the time I am solo. (That’s a disadvantage)
My friend the number of fallacies you have created this discussion are through the roof and I don’t get why you’re not able to read the words in front of you. You insult and accuse this entire time. This discussion has devolved because rather than reason you’d rather use harsh words and a closed mindset.
All I can say is I dont give two hoots about stacks in warthunder.
- you can clearly see who is the stack/clan at any time
- and most of the time there is another stack on your team to counter balance.
IMO I think 4 is the minium group size in games. Most of the time I play solo or duo…but to me games are meant to be enjoyed with friends. always a bummer when you finally get all the boys together but cant play together because no room
1 Like
My point being. I’ve said I’m all for Stack v Stack MM. I’m completely against lowering the stack size.
1 Like
I’m pretty sure he’s said it loudly many times. Though I think it’s “less toxic” while you phrase it as “more casual.”
I think stacks should be matched with stacks. It’s not a huge deal for me, but it makes more sense. There’s no denying the mismatch they create and the lack of requirement for voice comm’s and “friends” was, honestly, a draw to me. I’ve done that in the past and it doesn’t really fit my current lifestyle.
calm down guys , it is a warning
Already a thing in form of preferences (since there’s simply not enough stacks in Enlisted and faction bias exist, it’s neglectable. It simply do not work).
Classic intectually dishonesty. He acts as if he wants to solve the problem, but the only solution he’s offering, more or less already exists and is not working. So he doesn’t actually want to change anything.
Absolutely laughable, unbelievable hypocrisy.
I would say close it, but ok
I feel that way too. But I also experienced warthunder limping on for years until it finally got going.
who knows. 
If nothing else they are persistent
Oh I’d love Stack v Stack, never said I was against it. When Adam mentioned lowering the stack size I wasn’t gonna let that fly.
Stack v stack MM and in game comms would fix this issue of ‘toxic stacks’.
It can suck to play against a stack sometimes but as someone who’s played both I don’t think it’s that big of a deal rn.
From the start I’ve wanted stack v stack MM and in-game comms. You’re telling that it’s already in the game? I’ve not heard that it’s in at all.
The only idea of yours I have strongly disagreed with for as long as I can remember is this ‘lowering the max stack size’. I don’t find stacks a problem.
Also just stop with this calling me a liar stuff. If you can’t handle someone disagreeing with you can just turn off your computer.
1 Like
Name checks out. Your opinions are like pee, yellow and stinky.
The only hypocrite here is you as you revaled that you are:
- Deserting matches;
- Cant handle that enemy team is better;
- Crying on wrong shoulder;
- Unable to learn from the enemy;
- Just here for the EZ games.
Please stop your mental diarrhea. Thanks.
You don’t think you’re sweating or toxing, but when 4 people are coordinated, on comms, casually building 4 rallies, parking 4 APCs, planting 4*9 AP mines, covering both flanks, marking enemy vehicles and calling out enemy groups, all 4 using good/meta upgraded weapons – for the poor solo player on the other team who doesn’t have that – that feels like sweating and tryharding.
I know from personal experience that even having just 1 squad mate without comms, but knowing that he will build rallies and will PTFO, already increases the winnings chances tenfold.
Oh no, they are using team work in the team game. What a horror!
2 Likes
This whole conversation is just stupid people like working together and teamwork is fun and trying to get rid of the concept of it it’s just moronic.
1 Like
And the playing alone and just doing that over and over again it’s just sheer idiocy to me if people really want to do that they can just do it in customs instead of ruining public matches or we can’t have that give us XP for playing customs and doing what we want in customs so we don’t ruin the perfect world of public matches where people want to play alone.
And Adam you disgust me I hate your way of thinking and it makes this game even more lonely when there’s just so many brilliant mechanics for teamwork in this game.
1 Like
I doubt there is anything people can do, but pretty much for the last month or so I have rarely been in any competitive matches, they are all severe ass kicking’s one way or the other. I have been playing matches where I have a 4 member squad and the match is over before my first squad is eliminated, or matches where my first squads are killed and before I can spawn and get to the battle site with my second squads the match is over. I like winning, but this is not fun at all. I am retired so I have a lot of time on my hands, but I am playing less then I was before, and will not play with the American squads now as it became one ritual killing after another and my ranking was dropping faster then the soap in a prison shower. I started a German squad and after 138 matches have been on the winning side 78% of the time, and most of those matches were not close. It is a game, so I just treat it as so and hope at some point the matches can be competitive again more so then not, but I am not going to complain as the game is free, although I have spent some coin to speed up development of my German squads to make it competitive, but now realize I probably didn’t need to do it. LOL
1 Like
Things wouldn’t be so bad if defenders knew what their objectives were or we had some voice chat in this game so teams have some semblance of working together and not feel like they’re playing alone
2 Likes