Marshall ranks

[Shiivex]

@Brrady

A F-ton of players quiet any match they think there going to lose, and this is in part why so many attain Marshals rank fast.

this makes 0 sence, since one, still has to put the time to win matches to get points.

but ok.

[Daffan]

Why do u deserve those levels?

[Barendd1974]

Because the ranks should be a measurement of how well you play, not how much you play. I would say that i’m definitely an above average player.






I have a job, a social life, other games and other things to do. I don’t need you to increase the rank so only the people who play 24/7 can achieve it.

[Julmatar]

@GuardianReaper0

I thought about it further after reading your comment. Something that occurred to me is that:

@Julmatar

i think marshall ranks should be way harder to get even there would be 500 star i think it’s too easy

This has some potential in it IF more points were gained from Battle Hero rewards. In addition, the penalty for QUITTING a game should be increased to 2.

Here is the breakdown:

• Winning gives +1
• EACH “medal” obtained (Best flamethrower, tanker, infantry squad, etc.) is +1
• Being in the top 4 of the team gives +1
  Meanwhile
• Losing takes -1
• Quitting takes -2
• Being in the bottom 4 of your team is -1

This system would ensure that players that fight like crazy are rewarded with ranking for their efforts, even being able to recoup losses in a single good game. Meanwhile, players that just outright quit a game leaving their team stranded get heavily penalized, rather than the current system where they lose only as much as if they had just lost the game.
Even if players lose, but fought like crazy, they will at least break even, and if their efforts lead to the victory, they are rewarded further. The grind would be LESSENED for good players, and would be quite rough for those just casually quitting out of games repeatedly.

that actually would be really good way to do it so you still getting rewarded even you are losing team but played well. not just keep the star with battle hero.

[Julmatar]

@Barendd1974

Because the ranks should be a measurement of how well you play, not how much you play. I would say that i’m definitely an above average player.






I have a job, a social life, other games and other things to do. I don’t need you to increase the rank so only the people who play 24/7 can achieve it.

also why every1 has to get highest rank on any reason?

[Barendd1974]

I don’t get the highest rank. I stopped at top 10% because the rewards were permanent instead of time limited. Moscow Soviets are my main campaign group, so they are the farthest I have progressed and the only one I care now to keep track of. Mechanics shouldn’t be difficult through the manner of them taking a lot of time (this isn’t a phone game), they should be difficult requiring in game skill to be shown. The current system relies heavily on the team to win and increasing the levels to get the ranks by 200 (from the previous increase that doubled it) would not help anyone and it shows the people who play the game more, not the people that are actually good at it.