Maps, Attack-Defense, LMG, Sound

Suggestions
1

Please implement these if possible,

  1. Give us more maps, doesn’t matter if they are historical or not.

  2. Make the game as such that Allies and Axis, they can play both offense and defense in the same map. Some of the Axis players are getting bored just defending on most maps. (Maps like D-Day could stay Allies offense always, since it’s too much iconic but we don’t mind if Germans are landing on the beach as well like the US.

  3. Please please please improve the gun sounds.

  4. Please make the animation of an lmg as such that it would look like the player is holding the bipod with his other hand. Like this below:

lmg
lmg1366×574 192 KB

5 Likes
2

Yes :slight_smile:

Yes definitely as some of the gun sounds are the same and some sound rather bad.

3 Likes
3

I agree with the defense part (besides d day, they always need to be defensive, though we need more than 2 d day maps/approach paths) maps such as the bloody church map and the airfield force germans to defend ALWAYS

3 Likes
4

Hold up. Something ain’t right

I want them to add animation for deploying bipod. But they haven’t even animate rotating pan magazine in Soviet LMG…so it’ll be a long wait

2 Likes
5

Blockquote

(Maps like D-Day could stay Allies offense always)

I want to storm the beaches of Essex during ‘Fall D-Tag’

3 Likes
6

Yes

The biggest conflict in the human history but we don’t have data to make 30 maps so we must add our own, sure.

If we already want fantasy maps, what’s the point of adding for exaple vietnam war in the far future? It will be only one, maybe two maps that aren’t total fantasy so why bother?

The biggest conflict in the human history but we can’t find any situation when axis was atacking so we have to make our own, sure.

Making made up maps and made up operations (like germans storming the beaches of normandy) is both stupid an lazy. I have no idea why anyone would want this. Even BFV doesn’t have such level of BS.

Points 3 and 4 are good.

5 Likes
7

Dude it’s boring to play 90% of the times defending. And new maps would be refreshing too, you know, would bring some freshness to the game

8

Then ask for new maps instead of reverting existing ones (as it doesn’t make sense in many cases)?

1 Like
9

I don’t agree with this fully. We’re going to end up with CoD like maps if you push this sentiment too hard. There should be a focus on historical battles, but I wouldn’t fully oppose historically plausible battles. The issue with this statement is that you don’t clarify that.

1 Like
10

The main problem with the lack of Axis attacks during D-Day is that it’s set around the first few weeks or so of the Normandy front. I think that the campaigns shouldn’t be focused on periods of a week for that very reason. Instead, they should be of periods of roughly a year. Then Berlin would have the battle of Warsaw, Normandy could have the battle of the Bulge, Moscow could have the attacks around the Pripyet marshes, Leningrad, Kiev and Sevastopol. Then the supposed Stalingrad campaign could include Kursk

11

If you really want to have an Axis invasion on beaches, why not eventually have them do fictional campaigns like Operation Sealion?