I think that the player count on both sides (in Lone Fighter) should be 50 to 100 people to make battles more large scale, give more action, be different from other WWII games, and make it more exciting.
3 Likes
Lone fighters is just not fun, at any time ive played it. When they added it i tried it and it felt very dead because it was VERY dead. Tried it recently and it was HORRID with the amount of pure sweat and occasional cheaters.
Yes I tried it too and the first thing I notice was the number of spawn campers. Now when I get one of those BT that tell me to play x games of Lone fighter I re-roll.
Don’t see how you are going to get 50 to 100 players to play that mess. They need to just dump it and spend more time on squad mode.
1 Like
Yes. Agree. Bigger battle means more Strategic Possibility for players
I don’t think it is dead. I can find a game with 24 v 24 or 25 v 28 in under a minute.
I said it WAS dead. Now it feels like it attracted all the scummy players.
Not enough players play the mode.
Devs would prefer in under 10 seconds, and until that becomes consistent, I don’t see them increasing the numbers.