i wish theirs option on M10 stop cycling crew members to commanders seat.
Как лихо же Вы, господин, меняете тему разговора с одной несуразности на другую.
Dont forget the M8.
it had it worst when comes to that.
you could also kill your own gunner with the m8 ages ago
“So what if the majority of the playerbase is still around level 1-20??? So what if in 80% of the matches Jumbos always have the better advantage??? You guys gets panther at level 31!!! Sure, there’s only like 10% of the playerbase reaching that campaign level- BUT MY POINT STILL STANDS!!! HURR DURR DURR!”
Since release, its always Jumbo dominance on the field, even before Panther was dropped. It’s pathetic how they are justifying a clear, unbalanced advantage of Jumbo vs Pz IVs in Axis Normandy with a tank at level 30. Remember how Allied tankers always trolls Axis players by telling them “JUST AIM AT MG PORT LOL, JUST FLANK THEM, ITS EZZ!! STOP COMPLAINING” but the moment panther drops they are stuck in a limbo with half of their mouth screaming “LOL PANTHER IS SO EASY TO KILL WITH M10 GMC OR EXPLOSIVE PACKS” and the other going “PANTHER OP NORMANDY UNBALANCED!!!”
…But for the majority of all their matches, they extremely rarely encounter a single panther.
That says a lot.
1 Like
yeah i agree at lvl 20 axis should get AT LEAST a maus, if not how could we win against a nerfed jumbo with the 75?.
1 Like
Allies should get an M4A2(76) to deal with a better variant of Pz. IV (H), that way these two nemesis could actually handle one another. Both can one shot each other frontally at most angles.
Jumbo doesn’t. Just because it has a worse gun doesn’t means it cannot penetrate Pz. IV at all. It has thick hull and turret armor that requires you to shoot specifically at the MG port for a frontal penetration. Where as Jumbo can, most of the time, shoot the Pz.IV anywhere it wanted and it would penetrate IV’s thin armor.
I love how all Allies condescending counterarguments are always “YEAH SHUT UP WE KNOW YOU JUST WANT TIGER OR MAUS” without anything else to back them up before disappearing to nowhere. As if that would instantly wins them all arguments about the Jumbo problem.
“You’re nitpicking and biased I win bye bye” -Random Allies players in forum
Oh, yeah. No. “Just flank it how hard is it its ez” argument is invalid. EVERY tank weakness is getting flanked by their sides. Jumbo is obviously above Pz.IVs, and just because you can flank the former (LIKE EVERY TANK IN EXISTENCE) doesn’t justify its presence at level 20 Allies.
The majority of the player base is between level 1-20. Not a lot of people had grinded THAT far to level 30. The issue of Jumbo was prevalent long before the campaign update that added Panther and the others, it was all the way back to last year summer. Just because we Axis players gets a Panther at level 31 doesn’t means it suddenly justifies Jumbo presence at level 20 which have the clear advantage over others.
Come up with something better or actually provide ideas for a solution for this instead of just being your generic forum troll that just goes around “WOOO AXIS RANT THEY WANT TIGER”. That’s so overused you should take a break from Enlisted and touch some grass until you can come up with a better insult.
I don’t like the jumbo its a good tank with nerfer AT capabilities and axis cryed soo much that basically all the tank lineup of the US is shit.
So when people say JUMBO OP nah its a good tank and the only good tank US have at the moment.
Btw l2p angling with the pzIV and shooting the mg port its not that hard.
2 Likes
and there is the fact that all but the panzer 3N can overmatch the lower side armor if the jumbo angles too much
1 Like
Imagine trying to excuse or ignore the obvious balancing problem(s) in campaigns despite all the valid points with the most generic ‘AXIS JUST WANT TIGER OR MAUS’ and then thinking that they won the entire argument by default.
Cringe. I love how everyone is crying about Panther but Panther only shows up in like 1/20 of their matches because of the level 31 tedious grind.
The thing is, I love how people are defending Jumbo with just ‘JUST AIM AT MG PORT’ or ‘JUST FLANK SIDE ARMOR’. But when Axis say the same with Panther, oh, its unfair. No, it’s broken. It’s also amusing how my suggestion for the M4A2 (76) as a solid replacement is completely disregarded, as if I’m trying to remove all Allies tank just into Stuarts. Desperate much to defend your heavy tank that had been prevalently dominating many matches since last summer before the Panther were even announced? Hmm?
tanks that can overmatch jumbo’s side armor: puma, panzer 4J, premium panzer 3M, Panzer 4H, Panther
tanks that can overmatch panther’s side armor: M10, premium Sherman 1C “firefly”