Decent responce? Блть, я тебе сколько раз говорил, что Ржомба не убивал танки и ими не убивался, А ПАНТЕРА ЭТО ГРЁБАНАЯ МЕТА?
Ну что за дегенеративная хуня? Ты программа, которая только и делает, что пишет бред про достойный ответ, или что?
Other guys, my emotions are too strong,
to use Eng now. Sorry.
Chamomile tea is good for the nerves.
M10 without APHE, armor and turret rotation speed? It is more useless, than Stuart
I disappointed by unknowing of way to make your memory better
At least the Stuart can survive a Panther shoot.
First the Jumbo is too bad for being at top level and now the M10 is suddenly too bad for level 20 while it was okay for top level.
kk I guees.
I’m doing just fine. I played a lot before and after the panther. And I felt fine both before and after. You’re always whining.
I even pumped Berlin to level 26, so people like you don’t complain about panthers in every battle. And in Berlin, neither FG-42, nor Panthers did not annoy me. The infantry is very good at destroying a panther in the flangs with no problem.
On the one hand it is, on the other hand it allows the Allies to get a strong tank much earlier and dominate until the German player gets a Panther.
Didn’t you see difference between Berlin in Normandy, between PPSh and STEN, T34-85 and Jumbo, BAR and DP?
Well. Its a bit hypocrite…
Anyway if the Panther is really such as issue for Yankees, wouldnt make it more sense to give them the 76mm M10 earlier than another Sherman with a M3 cannon?
Ok. Don’t you see difference between M3 and PPS? Don’t you see difference in maps? Don’t you see difference in tanks? T34 has more speed, has EXCELLENT 85mm distructor with gorgeous reserve action and good penetration, and armor which helps sometimes
the only thing over hyped is your skill level
I personally don’t care.
I was in favor of replacing the Jumbo with a long-barreled Sherman even before the Panther came along. That way all the tanks would be sure to punch through each other.
But the players didn’t want to lose their jumbo, and the developers see development a little differently.
The M10 at 20 would make more sense, because its BR is closer to the Pz4H.
Also, the USSR in Berlin gets 0 to 100 tickets per point, when in Normandy the Allies get 200+.
I did not play that battle on a tank, only infantry. I only had 1 squad with PPS, so you can count the most I played with SVT and Mosin. And even so the best enemy player is twice as bad as me.
Of course I met players with full fg42-2 squads (which is noticeably better than a regular fg), but even them I usually overtook in kills even before the PPD appeared. Sometimes my team lost games against strong players, but that was because of the general ineptitude of most players and the skill of the opponents.
80%+ wins in Berlin when I checked my stats when I didn’t have PPD, DP, PPSh, AVS yet. That’s more than my win percentage in Normandy.
It turns out it was easier to play Berlin than Normandy on pretty much starter gear, even with the USSR getting few tickets for capturing the point.
Рыбкам привет
You’re really ridiculous.
“I am having high VR when plying vs germans in BERLIN so NORMANY is well-balanced”
Playing against the same weapons as Normandy, playing with starting weapons comparable to Normandy. I have fewer tickets to capture points.
You, on the other hand, play for one side and whine even when it was extremely strong.
PPS is comparable with M3? Nuff sad
Campaigns with different online by sides, with different maps, different weapons, specially - different tanks. I explained why T34-85 VS Panther is ok.
И ты так и не ответил
You are obsessed with your weakness. In the summer, the U.S. had a bunch of advantages that made it really hard to play against. As you can see, balancing measures are being taken
