The LVT in game is the LVT(A)-1 can carry 1000lb payload, but it has no access doors or ramp for infantry, so it’s pretty useless as an APC
The Ka-Chi is not an APC at all.
The LVT in game is the LVT(A)-1 can carry 1000lb payload, but it has no access doors or ramp for infantry, so it’s pretty useless as an APC
The Ka-Chi is not an APC at all.
The gunner positions have 360 degree traverse and small shields - they can be quite fun
Just because the idea makes you angry doesn’t mean that was the intent, chill bro
My issue is they’re not APCs. One’s a purpose-built amphib tank, the other is a tank variant of a purpose-built amphib APC. They can give us purpose built amphibious APCs without tampering with extant premium tanks squads of dubious utility. YMMVOC
We need tankodesants!!!
Why not both
Drive Backwards
That’s literally what I have said.
They could just add a regular LVT as a APC
I was reading down the thread, sorry.
You don’t have to apologize. I can relate to you.
great idea!
this will make these things that everyone already forgot about relevant.
in general its smart from companies to give bought premium items additional value over time, since that cultivates trust between them and the buyer, leading to more sales, even for underrated premium squads.
I agree with Adam.
An amphibious APC is a good idea, but as he says, it should be released as a new vehicle.
Both LVT and Japanese military amphibious vehicles have variants for APC.
US Marine Corps LVT-4
This is the famous tractor that was actually used when landing on Guadalcanal Island.
Unlike the ones already implemented in the game, it does not have a gun.
Japanese Navy Su-Ki
Japanese Navy Ka-tsu
This is a vehicle classified as LVT like the Ka-chi, but it is a version without excessive firepower.