Lowering the BR of the M18 and M10

First of all, I should say that this is a machine translation so it may be difficult to read.

Both the M10 and M18 are too weak despite their high BR.
M10 should be BR3, M18 should be BR4.
Because both the M10 and the M18 are open-top.
Too vulnerable to artillery, air and infantry attacks.
Finally, lowering the BR of Na-To should also be considered.

8 Likes

Lowering the M10 to BR III was suggested very recently
The M18 is already BR IV, it was changed from 5 to 4 a long time ago

8 Likes

I was not studying hard.

sorry

m18 should be br3, its armor is even weaker than br1 tanks, its roof is open, it doesn’t have mg next to its canon, its canon is not much different from pz iv j. its only advantage is its speed.

1 Like

He has speed, but he has to rely on surprise attacks.

1 Like

It’s just fast, and that’s the most useless thing in enlisted.

1 Like

The main reason is that the maps are too small, so War Thunder is more suitable. Some maps there are larger and don’t have infantry attacks. In Enlisted, only one or two enemy tanks get marked in a match, and every enemy player will try everything to take them outafter all, the maps are that small.

2 Likes

I think it would be better to just delete them.

Worthless garbage, only increases R&D costs