These are 2 SMGs at BR2 Germany that should be lowered to BR1 to better reflect their performance in comparison to other similar SMGs at BR1.I will be using the STEN Mk 2 and 3 for comparison, since they are BR1 SMGs that have similar performance.
while having 0.2 more damage, a slightly higher rate of fire of 690 RPM, slightly less dispersion (even though it’s still terrible) and 30 more velocity compared to the STENs, this is about where the pros end. It has a reload of 2.8 seconds, half a second longer than the 2.3 on both STENs ; 11 vertical recoil where the Mk2 has 8 and the Mk3 has 9, over double the visual recoil, and the magazine takes up a lot of your screen
This gun is similar in the reasons above this one, but with a few differences. The pros of this gun are the 0.2 higher damage, 1 less horizontal recoil, and 30 more velocity. This gun has a 0.18 second slower reload; the same awful dispersion of 8.1; a much slower rate of fire of 520 RPM fully upgraded, where the STEN Mk2 has 630 RPM and the Mk3 has 570; over double the visual recoil, and less interior room on the sights then the STENs
For those reasons, to show that they are fairly equal guns, they should be brought down to BR1.Here are the stats of the weapons