The only part I find disagreeable is if the Na-To is getting moved to BR3, the StuG 3F should stay in BR3.
The longer Japanese 75s have similar pen to german pak 40s.
The only part I find disagreeable is if the Na-To is getting moved to BR3, the StuG 3F should stay in BR3.
The longer Japanese 75s have similar pen to german pak 40s.
It needs swapping to see any use, that’s why it’s important to mention it here. I’ve literally seen UCs the day they became available, but never once an SU-76M.
Keeping the changes to free tanks only speaks to the broader playerbase, there’s a point to be made about that. But I think we need to include some of the paid tanks to see more tank variety.
Just a note, APCR is complete garbage.
Why? Same armor as BR1 Panzer III J, but no turret or MG.
This thing is completely useless in BR3
Because its BR3 - who on this planet would pick open top, no armor, no turret, no mg over a KV1?
Read my rationale.
Look at the Na-To’s similarities.
Re-read your own reply.
I really don’t like to compare any vehicle to Japanese ones- their tank balance is all over the place.
It’s not that difficult.
The Na-To is a barely-armored open-top half-track with a cannon with similar pen performance to a Stug 3F, is the size of a bus, has less overall ammo than the StuG 3F, has 10 less HE shells (lmao AP/APCR/HE load) and as a consequence of its size, is about as mobile as a slug.
If you want its WT BR, it’s 3.3. Same as the stug.
There is no reason for the Na-To to be higher than a stug in terms of BR.
Not to mention it makes no difference to a stug/german. Since he wont see it
So? Maybe put that one down into BR2 aswell?
My point is that a Stug cant be BR3,
when a Panzer IV with the same gun is also BR3.
Same goes for all SPGs. Why do you specifically bring up Japanese tanks is weird to me.
I brought it up because a vehicle that is equal or worse than the StuG 3F isn’t receiving the same preferential treatment.
I brought it up as a point of comparison because the original guy who made the suggestion puts the thing in BR3 while the StuG 3F is being lowered to BR2 in spite of the flaws of a comparable tank.
Do I have to recap and summarize every post I make because you cannot follow the logical sequence of replies?