As someone who has been playing since OBT non stop daily, i am really burned out, because for me - the last big amount of content was - Berlin.
Tunisia is really boring for me.
So longer time enlisted players - what would make the game feel more fresh and less repetitive?
For me it would probably be:
New gamemodes (Hardcore or large scale)
New campaign (pacific)
New levels (Come on wheres the STG in berlin?)
AI tweaking would be appreciated too
larger maps with new constructions and new gamemodes.
When the next batch of levels come, if they are actually decent (not like the last ones that sucked ass) i might start playing more than 5-10 games a week again
I am really not even sure what keeps me going at this point. Probably all the money i spent that will feel wasted when i quit
a larger playerbase
Itâs what I want most, and maybe later a new campaign (Pacific Iwo Jima)
i hear instant gaming has some real deals in some shooters, not namign any names
So this might be a bit off key, but for me, I would like a grand campaign, with procedurally generated maps.
In short, I donât feel like writing an essay. I want to pick a spot on a map and fight there in the time period that battles happened at that point (so, say I pick Kursk, I have a tech tree that gives me what existed at Kursk, at that time).
As well, you could make the grand campaign map dynamic, where say, Axis wins enough times, and it pushes our progress East More. And then if Soviets succeed later in counter attacks, it pushes it back again.
Kinda like how some planets and zones are fought for in MWO (to cite a basic example).
That would really liven up the game, and at least make me feel like Iâm accomplishing something other than wining or losing a fight.
Might sound counterintuitive, but more micro managing of troops - some troops can permanently die or take days to recover, weapons degrade after use, vehicles require days to repair. Force you to play other campaigns.
Fresh troops and weapons in daily rewards depending on the campaign you complete task in.
I would play that. I think there is a game called Foxholes that is like that. âMatchesâ last for like a week.
Iâd love if Enlisted switched to fronts and tech trees. Iâve actually been working on a suggestion about this for some time.
Fronts would be similar to how campaigns are currently, as in each one would have two sides to progress through. But each front would be divided into campaigns/battles throughout history, these battles would serve as matchmaking checkpoints, and would also bring new maps. In the matchmaker, the rarity and quantity of a weapon will determine who you face, but the matchmaker would loosen over queue time elapsed.
Tech trees would give you more choice in what to grind first, and allow you to skip a few weapons from each rank that you donât want. All equipment (i.e. throwables and backpacks) and squads would be automatically unlocked as you ranked up. Another idea I had, is, perhaps we could have purchasable attachments (grenade launchers, bayonets, scopes, etc) that could be equipped onto weapons, instead of entirely new weapons.
I like the idea, though I feel like it is too drastic of a change from the current system. However, it could definitely make for epic alternate history events, such as a full-scale invasion of D-day that uses the whole map and lasts a week.
Oh it might very well be, but I had so much fun once I could be the Sword of Davion on MWO, that I canât help but feel like this game could benefit from that. It wouldnât remove the primary mode (much like it doesnât in MWO) but it could give us something else to work towards, and feel like all those squads or tanks we sacrificed in battle meant something.
Faction with their real strong point and weak point, not like now every Faction need the same thing for sake or balance
Iâm thinking Pacific theater will highlight something like this.
Where just as an example, the Japanese players will have 14 Person infantry squads, but all BAâs, and the US has 8 Person, but can use Semiâs etc etc.
Those are just numbers, not actually what I think would be balanced.
Its going to have to be something like that though IMO to make it work properly.
Im worried japanese start bunny hooping with mp40 and g41 and some german volunter with tiger show up for help them, if is for me i give to japanese high-end BA a rate of fire of 90-100 so they dont have to use experimental or lend-lease semi-automatic for example
Personnally, instead of adding new levels, i welcome more the new gamemodes, new maps, new system etc. Gaijin style patch(adding new thing to gain attention) is temporary and it makes people exhausted.
More maps
New modes
Donât really care about levels
Gimme tempelhof airport, u-baun, reichstag, berlin suburbs
New gamemode: CAMPAIGN!
Such as the one found in RO2. It was mainly to justify wich map was played and why, but it added an extra dimension that made âstaying a bit longer to see the issue of the warâ more fun.
Tickets could be influenced by previous victories/defeats, as well as who defend and attack.