Limit body armor USSR

as I explained in other posts even with photos,give all faction body armor

1 Like

Dead faction full of bots… Why are we doing this “suggestion” again… Feels like running around in circles.

Nah. I’m just tired of whiners like you. And like adamnpee has said, I paid good money for this cosmetic, so no.

4 Likes

So whats the problem since you only paid for cosmetic appearance ?

2 Likes


3 Likes

Womp womp skill issue. Not going to go over why 10% is not relevant in a game with an extremely fast TTK. Keep using the 10% as an excuse to why you lose your games. Oldest excuse in the book.

5 Likes

Gotta agree, Axis just got actually a pretty strong forhead assault engineers who prone can take an AVT round or two in the head and keep going.

Theyre meta, and distributed to most of the playerbase for f2p, not for paying for cosmetics.

Are we gonna nerf them now too??
Body armor existed and exists IRL; it was obviously pretty weak in WW2 (as visible by weak effect in a low TTK game) so honestly are fine. Im fine with more of these arriving for different nations (Japan esp) as they existed in limited way and started arriving in larger numbers for US towards 1945

If we ever get post war campaigns/ higher BRs these are only going to get more common. Like real life, well need a way to keep the TTK in check as more firepower becomes available in future tiers.

1 Like

And that means you acknowledge as an advantage to it so that means we should either all have damage reduction body armor or no one should have it

You’re paying for cosmetic not damage reduction

every time you use that argument I’m only hearing yes we should remove the damage reduction body armour from you.

And I want that helmet gone I don’t want it in the game unless we all have Body armor with 10% damage reduction and if the Germans or Japanese finally get their own helmet and body armor 10% damage reduction everyone else should get some too.

people like you bother me, most of factions make their own body armors, I will share photos, and shut up, if soviets have, let others do it, for all or for nobody, because it’s unfair you get because you paid a 10% of protection, in where a normal thing would kill you,for that armor, you will survive, it’s unfair even if actually soviets are dead now, it goes same for japan with planes with rockets, we have in WT and for some reason DF refuse to give it to us, now, time to share the body armors for different factions
armor-body-japanese-iron-jacket (2)
Japanese body armor
main-qimg-81cd1ef4c1ec1f1a301006e4f5be2279-lq
main-qimg-912961bd34e8a9209a4c80e84eab50bd-pjlq
main-qimg-702448093f39faa2d117d4e75b4006e8-lq

1 Like

It is relevant to my low damage Beretta. The fact that some faction is unpopular should not be an argument for making it stronger.

Half of the forum is like that. Even the moderators have already given up. Everyone just fights for their faction. I have an advantage because I play all but the Russians. That armor makes a difference, I need one more hit to kill him. With seven soldiers, that’s seven hits more. and two less kills. or three. Even a soldier with one percent of health can shoot.

1 Like

No.

We should strive to be historically realistic;
USSR deployed them to a medium degree - ie theyre an equippable cosmetic
Japan used them to a medium degree in 2nd half of war - they SHOULD be a equippable cosmetic
Axis used them in specialty units - they should be in f2p/premium squads
Allies experimented with them / started equipping in late war (M12 armored vest, T64 vest) - likely f2p/late war premium squads.

I think thats reasonable. Unless u want to push the all should be equal meta, in which case u open an entire can of worms re Weak AT, different grenades, 100rd MGs, SMGs/ARs etc etc, which honestly is a hard pass.

1 Like

Agreed, I just wanna put on those fur caps because they look cool, but helmets have a functionality so I use those instead. And it’s called “cosmetics” so I don’t get why they should have a use in the first place.

1 Like

This is not balanced. Everyone should be able to wear a bulletproof vest. Let’s not try to be historically accurate, because history sucks.

they can be ingame, but just as purely cosmetic without bonuses. if they are functional then they need to be part of the equipment that can be bought for silver.

and yet somehow we are getting equal meta with every new update.

1 Like

Historically accurate game

Yeah no dog; u lost me here;

Im not asking for a Captured Soviet/Amerikan Tiger2 for balance reason; Or Pzfaust for USA; so Im not gonna ask for body armor for countries that didint use it en masse.

Soviets suffer shit Air, US no hv tank; Axis can suffer with 83% dmg reduction plate helmet for every f2p player. O7

3 Likes

Чем вам ссср не угодили с их 10%, которые ничего не решают? А вас не смущает то, что немецкие инженеры выдерживают попадание почти в упор с винтовочного калибра 7.62 и даже не падают в нокаут, продолжая бегать и стрелять, как ни в чем не бывало? Вас не смущает то, что ГОЛОВА выдерживает больше урона, чем торс в броне?

4 Likes