It has been loudly stated for several months now what is happening with the ppsh. See above
Where is Stalingrad exclusive guns? will they remain exclusive? or stay?
They will be exclusive, and will remain to all who unlock and buy it in time.
Bruh, you can’t read the entire sentence? They said they added folders that require you to only unlock the first stuff. So leveling up is indeed faster because there is less stuff that must be unlock in the tech tree.
barely anything has been put in folders.
Realisticly makes no difference.
My Point remains, and you are its best example.
Lol, Germany has 9 stuff in the folder, there is something.
Lol so less item to unlock don’t make things faster, somebody is bad at math.
You said player are dumb because they think that less tier means faster progression. But you are the one that is dumb because you completely ignore the folder and assume they don’t know the thing you said.
1 Like
When are we going to get the flak Panzer tank and the m19 we really need one for Normandy Campaign because the ju-188 p47 and A-20s are getting aggressive towards both side and the german planes they have are crap against American tanks i was hoping if the next up date we can have a chance to have aa tanks for both side like these two
1 Like
how can be same tier pz.2 type c and T - 26?
I personally dont care about the progression or Battle Rating change; to everyone complaining about this or that tier or BR, keep in mind, right now, we are playing with no tiers nor BR’s, so a brand new player fresh out of their Bot battles, can face a squad full of STG44’s with their full squad of rifleman and no one is batting an eye. I still see people pissing tickets away on starter tanks getting murdered by Tiger’s and Panthers.
No the real question is what is happening with priorities of unlocks. As in, for example, right now say I’ve gotten the MP40 and the respective squad that researches it’s upgrade track, in 3 different campaigns. In Campaign 1, I’ve unlocked 2 star upgrade, in Campaign 2, 1 star, and in Campaign 3 I haven’t done any research: Which takes priority in the new system?
Same for soldier upgrades. Say in Assault II’s, and say I’ve gotten them in 2 different campaigns for the same nation. In Campaign 1 I took backpack upgrades, in Campaign 2 I took secondary weapon. Right now, if I recruit a new Assault II for Campaign 1, it will always have a backpack slot, and in Campaign 2, a secondary slot. But after the merge? Which takes priority. I understand we keep the squads and research progress, so if I have 3 Assault II’s, from the Pacific, Normandy, and Tunisia, and I took different upgrades in each, and I immediately recruit a new Assault II upon patch day, what will that Assault II have? A back pack slot or a secondary slot? Or will it be both (obviously not but you get the idea).
This is a far more important thing than trees or BR as we already like the game without those and all those do is streamline/balance things a bit, but if I need to say, have Normandy be the prioritized squad, and I dont like the current unlock, I have squad change tokens to use now and soldiers to re-spec.
Also, the Soldier skill rework, it’s unclear but is that still coming with this Merge or is that put off to a different update, again, far more important info than BR or Tiers.
2 Likes
So i know this is quite late but can you add like a weapon test option for gold weapon? so we can see if we want that weapon so that way we wont regret buying it.
3 Likes
i might just make a suggestion post and see how people thing i guess but im a bit busy so i wont create it yet.
I have already suggested in an earlier topic what is wrong, or rather too strong on its tier.
And I see that lvl 10 has become 5, and this is a good solution, at least it will not be monotonous in the equipment in battles.
What worries me the most is that before I go out to the first battle, I will be rearranging my equipment for three hours, like in EFT.
And making templates to the appropriate level. It will be interesting.
1 Like
Thats what im looking forward to.
I love building my decks to match a period haha
2 Likes
Well done! Another update when the DEVs refuse to make a balanced game. Yeah!
Because they want this to be War Thunder 2.0
I really think this is a big mistake going for “game play” vs historic.
I mean, getting an M44 before the 1895 Winchester? WTF? If you really wanted to make some kind of metric and still stay true to history…why not take COST into account? One of the reasons why the Mosin Negant was adopted was because it was CHEAPER to produce. Make the Winchester insanely expensive, incentivizing a cheaper development to arm the bulk of your armies. This will also curb the issue of having all assault rifles eventually.
This is a WWII game, not Call of Duty…The bolt action was the main weapon in the majority of armies all the way up to 1945. This game should reflect that.
I loath the idea of volks weapons being developed in this tree well before common German weaponry. Again, cost should be taken into consideration.
3 Likes
Nope. Enlisted is the least welcomed project inside Gaijin.
BTW, if nothing changed to WT, it will also slowly fade away.
2 Likes
What happens to our PREMIUM WEAPONS ? On the Axis, in 3 campaigns, I have the VMP, MkB 35 and Schmmiesser 36. On the allied side, a PPD BraMit. I am planning to get the MkB 42 (premium) now.
What level will I be in now if I were to use an assault squad composed of an MkB 42, MkB 35, VMP and Schmmeiser 36 ?
Hey, the Kriegsmodell doesn’t make sense, but there goes one less painful gun to use. I think Darkflow wants to get rid of that mistake. I am happy for that, cheers.
And is it gonna be possible to upgrade those weapons? Namely MP-717(r). After the merge.
1 Like