Me too its the only Anti-Tank Rifle that shoots were im aiming
Why the fuck you would use an anti tank rifle over a panzerfaust against late war tanks? Panzerfaust, Ofenrohr, Type 5, Type 4, etc can destroy vehicles much faster than an AT rifle.
I remember this huge insult in Stalingrad where Germans get captured PPSh but Soviets donât get captured MP40. I honestly think PPD-40 shouldâve been an unlock in Stalingrad instead of the much rarer Thompson 1921 and the box mag version of the PPSh for mid unlock. Its tough to find a place for the M1928A1 Thompson for USSR but the M1911 would be a nice addition.
The gremans didnât have many MP-40s in the Battle for Grad maybe around 30,000 at most but thats no excuse for it not being added.
However the Soviets loved MKbs and StGs and would capture and stockpile them for major offensives
again you need to have it because the armor protect in berlin is far too great for PTRS or m1a1 to be useable as anti tank weapons
Soviets in BerlĂn used american bazookas
Ptrs41 was not used as an dedicated antitank weapon, so, ptrs41 canât go to berlin
And, 8 millions of panzerfaust vs 178562 of ptrs41 produces
No information of ptrs41 in battle of berlin
So, i donât found a point to replace panzerfaust by ptrs41
no information of fedorov in berlin either.
Its still there.
Hardly a issue.
and thatâs why I donât use fedorov
1 Like
Soviets got captured Breda.
I dont get the conplaint. After all, German suffer as well because now they have drums as well.
There are images of Soviets using the PTRS in Germany 1945 so I dont really see the issue of not giving them the things historical-wise
Donât care if panzerfaust is there, I wanna use bazooka or ptrs