Do you provide yours? Why would I need to share my stats for your ridiculing purposes?
Maybe to back up all the kd stuff you care so much to a point you state another user just suck because of his playstyle?
Maybe, just maybe your stats donāt reflect the texts you so rightfully state.
1 Like
You can find me in the game now. Axis, Moscow, lets play! No need for ridicule or sarcasm. I am easy enough to find, canāt be more specific than I was about where I play. My screenshots I posted in numerous topics, btw as well. Feel free to add.
Just print your stats here.
If kd itās the way to be an ace. I would like to see your stats. Just that.
I m not interested in screenshots of scores. Just your stats.
Of course you donāt have to, but unavoidably fighting on cap points WILL get you killed more often than the guy whoās camping from 200m afar.
And I also dare say that, if said guy camping from 200m afar is actually doing a good job, someone in the opposite team will soon notice and snipe/bomb/blast him back.
1 Like
Yeah. We need know if you are just another false prophet with pathetic 15:1 kd ratio that just pretend to be ace and make up stupid ārulesā who is aceā¦
Or if you are true ace like guys with thousands of kills per match like we have seen on these forums
1 Like
I will show you why I belive your stats just simply suck untill you show us
This is yours. Itās the only Pic I found of you. For a 106 kill you got killed 24 times.
If we take into consideration minimal squad size of 4ā¦ 29*4=116
116/104kills. As 1.11 Kdr. What is even that on a casual game!?
Show us your overall stats so I can make a point about the way you are approaching this.
If we take normal squad size of letās say 7. You lost 203 soldiers to kill 104 players.
Way to go champ. Be an ace with that stats.
Also 41 min to do 106 kills is around 2.5kills per minute.
As some one focusing so much on Kdr. You have a long way to go.
5 Likes
Let me further stress the point:
KDR is nothing.
What makes you a pro Enlisted player is consistently scoring a high combination of total kills, engineer points, caps and kills at objectives.
I think you accidentally inverted the math. 104 kills / 116 deaths = 0,89
while the win rate of GAMES is 50%, because of the bot players filling out the games the losing team on average has less real players, meaning that the player winrate is higher on average
edit: the best way to determine gow good a player is would be winrate, since enlisted doesnt have SBMM
93.25 assistā¦ 106 kills. Pretty heavy vehicle using and still dying more then others in teamā¦ looks like our ace is real hero of kamikazes
5 Likes
My bad then. Ty for pointing out.
Ence why, stats would back or not the information he is trying so hard to point.
Right?
1 Like
Absolutely.
But somehow i have feeling we never will see those numbers
1 Like
Canāt we search othersā stats in game? In WT thatās possible.
We will one day, as they stated when they presented this stats that one day we ill be able to see others.
All that needed to be said was already saidā¦ KD means literally nothing.
Caps, Cap attack/defense kills, engineer points. That is what matters the most.
Rather than kamikazes etc. I would respect a person with just a bloody 15 kills and 20 deaths if he got more caps or engineer points than the rest of the team combined.
I can sit in a Jumbo and spam HE and MGs all day long, racking up those non-cap meaningless kills. Did I help? Kindaā¦ but my actions were nowhere near impactful.
5 Likes
Thatās fun once in a while tho.
2 Likes
Not saying it isnĀ“t, but it also deprives you of right to have a big mouth or flex your kd in the match, when there are way more impactful players on the battlefield.
Sadly, these true heroes who were essential in the match, arenĀ“t even rewarded as well as they would deserve while the most useless kamikaze in the team enjoys his 20k exp.
3 Likes
There is more, but again, your insults and language just shows that you are mad. Frankly I canāt even believe I used to comment and liked your posts. That vulgarity, ridicule and just hate is insane. Why would I have a conversation with you???
I am proud of this pic. I played a specialized team with only one capable teammate - the guy ranked number 2. We almost won that game against a coordinated and communicating team with specific roles and attack. This isnāt a normal or balanced game - just look at how even each badge on enemy team was assigned. Thats how you know you are playing a top tier team.
Itās actually a perfect illustration of what I talked about in my original post. I discussed different type of games (randoms vs randoms; capable vs random; and heavily coordinated team vs randoms). This is a an illustration of the latter. If you opinion that I sucked somehow on that team despite having yet we almost won against that dedicated of a team, then ok cool. Thanks for sharing your opinion. But this isnāt going against my K/D concept in any shape or form. Why do you think I got killed so much - because they were losing tons of tanks and planes and infantry. I also had second most objective defenses. If we would have won this game I would have been very excited and surprised because it would not have been possible with a random squad of players whose all K/D were below 1:1. Almost no one was defending objective and we still almost won!!! It came down to the wire. Stats tell you a lot of things.
Did you notice that I am the only player there with 1:1 ratio? Have you ever been on a team like that and almost beat a team that had 8 major badges so well spread out?
But if in your opinion it shows that I suck, ok, cool. Again, I am not mad. I am not going to insult you back. You are entitled to your opinion.