Keep all BR separate from each other. Yes/NO?

Agreed. I actually made a post insisting br4 getting its own queue. So br4 only facing its own br.

2 Likes

I can only agree. Each BR should be separated from each other.

I also agree that the game is way less fun when there is a huge imbalance between teams.
It make no sense that I have to try to make a dent in a KV-1 or a M4A2 with my GrB-39.

I’m ok with waiting longer in que for a fair battle.

Or they could make it so we can choose between different BR setups when a battle is available.

agree +0 MM is ideal and perfect no matter how you look at it

and if somehow the devs manage to grow the game it could get better i guess

Speaky of rental tank system, I discovered two days ago that for germany, the BR4 replacement tank is still the Pz IV H which is a BR3 tank… it should be replaced by a Panther or Jagdpanzer but I’m too lazy to make a suggestion about it. But it’s not like the replacement tank system is any good to begin with…

1 Like

I disagree, I like having a little mixed bag

1 Like

I didn’t realize this was an issue, I queue to to all servers and can get a match almost instantly. I can understand for those that want to play depending on their region or platform preference as well.

Well, that’s nonsense.

Number of queues for ±1 MM:

I. BR1 - BR2
Ii. BR2 - BR3
iIi. BR3 - BR4
iV. BR4 - BR5.

±1 MM has literally just one less MM queue.

Not to mention current BR4 could be split into BR3 and BR5
As currently it works only as some kind of pseudo buffer between BR3 and BR5. Since SF rifles are so much superior to anything BR4 can provide, it’s really not a favorite BR to play, at least amongst veteran players.

This game could easily have only 4 BRs.


If there’s going to be enough will, ±0 MM is definitely achieveable in future.

You can’t only consider the number of MM queue, you need to consider the ability to uptier and downtier. When a br has less number of player it get players from other br in the queue so there is enough player. This is not the case for ± 0 br.

Weird to see this from a guy who is against suggestions of certain br4 item going to br3 because of powercreeping.