Just One More Assaulter

Well, for that the Fedorov might sound dope (although a AVS or AVT might do about the same job as well) but the rest are just BRIV counterparts and the only 100rd Premium MG is the 100rd DP which is still a DP28.

Is that good?

But dont SF have better dispersion and at leasr managable recoil?

Definitely not, Fedorov MG has insanely low dispersion and has 13.9 dmg which is enough to kill Germans in a single hit while also having 25 rounds. I would always take Feddy over AVS/AVT they are only accurate in first few shots after that it goes all over the target.

And once i finish entire mag on Feddy i can switch to RD-44 and just wreck entire squads of infantry (it always kill in two hits no matter what with amazing accuracy).

Beltfed is not great so you always need to have to switch to RD-44 but then ammo count will be a problem after a while so Feddy is definitely a better choice at BR5, and i will never believe that it’s weak enough to be a BR4 it will always be played by me at BR5, it has even better power than actual Fedorov Avtomat.

Not really just better than M1919 but you can use i believe 4x secondary slots for Stinger which would be pretty devastating.

Not while i’m playing with them especially T20 is just dreadful. AVT after buff is not bad but i would still prefer RD-44 and Fedorov over it. FG42 II shoots too fast so even it’s relatively low recoil/dispersion stats turn into highly inaccurate gun.

I would flexibelize the medic slots in all squads, doing so we will have the possibility of + 1 ‘‘assaulter’’ in the assaulter squad.

yes against riflemen, machine gunner, snipers,
riflemen have only two more soldiers then assaulters
a smg is better then a bolty or semi at many ranges
yes an smg is better in urban and was
but it should not be oops i ran into a assaulter squad should have should assaulters
mgs only have four mg soldiers they would demand five
are sf rifles and assault rifles poorley balanced yes
but consider all br’s before saying something
now if you could only and i mean only use them at br5
then hell have a squad of all six assaulter oops all nuts
but giving them one more specialist is the definition of power creep or you would not want it

youre already oops al specialist but ok only if you are kitted to br5 otherwise 4 assaulters let you be a pain for br4 5 guess what i dont play

I understand for “balance” reasons why we can’t have a full 7 Assaulters although some premiums already basically have that.

But you already do deal with 5 man Assault squads, they’re just called Medics and Guerillas

I just want one little more Assaulter to the one and only assault squad

yes but those squads just have five assaulters
at the very least you have to go from 7 to 6 soldiers

I know they probably wouldn’t change Assault’s composition to just be assaulters, since this squad represents shock troops so you don’t need a MG or Engineer or whatever
image

But everyone can still customize their Assault squad however they like. If you have 5 Assaulters you can no longer have 3 extra classes. Or someone just chooses to have 3 or 4 Assaulters for their personal comp. The point is 5 is the maximum

2 Likes

wrong?

except medics and guerilla do not have any other specialist.

so it’s " fine " as throw away squad.

assaulters are much more than that.

so, no.

they do not need an additional redundant auto weapon to reach 6 automatic members.

and matter of fact, medics are straight up better because they can keep the rest of the other assaulters alive. to which, no. they aren’t " discount assaulters ". they are much more.

I really don’t see a need for this. Neither I see a need to add 4th or even 5th MG.
Instead of adding powercreep we should nerf SF rifles that cause it in a lot of cases.

1 Like

Would be the best final solution, but I guess SA and BA rifles suck because they make you aim more.

1 Like

Well, at least many ppl suggest buffs to SA so they keep up with the powercreep. That can’t be said for every weapon…
image

1 Like