July 17, 1942

Adults talk to adults, you don’t qualify

Oh boy. I love you. Pointing the finger is sooo much easier than actually coming with something ehh?

1 Like

Here you go, review, learn enjoy Statistics of the Battle for Stalingrad - YouTube

Höhöhö


Hmm Doesnt say anything about the total casualities (he does only talk indirectly about losses and that only to present the numbers of active soldiers per division etc. during the German assaults).
Video even starts with myths about the number of troops etc.) deployed at the beginning of the battle.

And remember that this is about one army/ corp per side, not all (62th on Soviet side and the 51th Corps of the 6th German Army)

Impressive. Next time you maybe actually read the description, let alone watching the video or reading the script.

1 Like

I think you failed English and common sense at the same time. Ppl like you are beyond educating.

Okay. Show me the spot where he said the number of the total casualities in Stalingrad. Maybe he simply screwed up his own description. Not everyone knows the content of his own video.

2 Likes

I think you’re a clown, if you’re not a clown, then it’s sad.
Although you’re just a wehraboo.

1 Like

I am a Nazi. Cool.

Now why am I wrong? Because I am a Nazi?

Thats just lazy writing.

1 Like

I’m lazy to write more and concrete, yes.
If you are a Nazi, then you are biased in any way, because the Nazis are those who exaggerate the importance of their nation.

2 Likes

So wiki is Nazi? Cool.

The dude who created this topic is a Stalin simp but unlike you guys I am not desperate enough only writing commie ant.

Honestly dont write anything at all then. More productive and usefull for everyone here. Complete waste of time.

2 Likes

Both Nazis, communists, can write on the wiki, and other who else can write.

Do you really not understand the difference between Nazism and communism?Damn…

But you can write useless nonsense?

2 Likes

Dude never say to a commie, the soviet dint win withaut lose man (alot) and drinking vodka

1 Like

Luckily commies and nazis cant write books or YT videos. Oh wait.

Yeah. The Nazis killed less people than communism and the Nazis lost a war.

And the logic that a communist/ CCCP simp cant think biased about SG but a Nazi always does is pretty dumb.

Well. I didnt call anyone commie until you called me a nazi clown.
Not that hard to find out who lowered the level here.

2 Likes

All can.

Nazism literally killed more people, but that doesn’t mean they were all soldiers. On the contrary, only a small part.

The Communists have no point in exaggerating anything.
The Nazis, yes. Nazism has no nationality, it can be a Jew, a German, a Russian and a Chinese, unless an American can’t.
So it says a lot about a person who calls a Nazi/nationalist a communist, this is nonsense.

I’m only saying what I see.

1 Like

Estern europe have a different story to tell about communism

4 Likes

But they have more credibility than wiki?

Unemployed Austrian artist: 6-8 million jews etc. and up to 8-9 million civilians
Mao: 40mio people (depending on source even more
Stalin: 20mio people (depending on source even more)

“Small”

There was no Western Allied Stalingrad. That was his point.
And yet there is Tunisia where the Axis lost similiar amount of ressources and strategic value as in SG but wirhout inflicting absurd high casulaties on Allied side.

But you guys are either too dumb or too ignorant to talk about it and waste my time with videos about the amount of troops deployed before the Soviets encircled the city, refering to a source with three different numbers and finally the master here who literally didnt say anything than clown.

You even prefer to have a talk about a forum communism vs nazism debate no. 666 than actually talking about my points of Stalingrad vs. Tunisia because you are “too lazy” to do the last one.

At least the China clown refers to them unlike you two clowns who thought it would be easier to poison the well.

I didnt have the need to call him commie ant but your whole argument was Nazi clown and you are talking about exaggeration?

He says Stalin and USSR were good. I guess that doesnt say anything at all. Can be a Russian or a Yankee, but well… in this forum 9/10 times the commie is a Russian/ Russian-speaking pleb.
On what base do you call someone a Nazi?

4 Likes

Oh there is another difference:

The Nazis treated the Germans way better than Stalin and Mao their people and that was a nation with the SS and Volkssturm.

1 Like

No,only archives that are still doubtful, but nevertheless more reliable sources can not be found.

Yeah, and 20 million Soviet peacefully workers and peasants but they’re not people, right?Its not matter, of course.

You’re lying, I personally saw him kill 357,523,943 people with his own hands. These are just the deaths that I have personally seen.

Because it can be seen by your message, literally this:

It doesn’t concern me at all:

Of course, you lived there. First from 1933 to 1945 in Munich, then from 1922 to 1945 in Leningrad, yeah?

And then ask why I called you a clown?

1 Like

Not like wiki doesnt refer to them as well.

Also: Did you see Hitler personally killing 666.666.666 Soviet children by choking each of them to death while laughing? No. Then it didnt happen.

Ahh I love this argument (mostly cause you commie ants use it all the time). For some reason, it doesnt count anymore when people use it for the death bill of the Nazi terror. Maybe because its a shitty argument which doesnt counter anything or bias.

I dont know how this proves anything? I could be a ancap and I would say the same because its true and you just dont give crap about it (or maybe you refer to the Tunisia vs. Stalingrad idk. You are even too dumb to quote in the mainstream way, even changing your style in the same post because logic)

There are a lot of things which doesnt concern you and it says a lot about your priorities.

Well. Did YOU live in this time? Ehh Probably not.

Maybe use arguments which cant be used against you in such a easy way?

I prefer being a clown than a double standard idiot who is too stupid to quote properly and relies on ad hominems and well poisining.

2 Likes