Feel like it’s time for jets since we have tanks and guns of the Korean War already… Might aswell add 1944/45 era jets.
Can be easily copied from War Thunder and enough for each side.
2 Likes
Wut?
2 Likes
no
3 Likes
M2 Carbine and Pershing tank?
Both ww2 stuff, just used later in Korea. Nothing special to Korea war.
5 Likes
We’re nowhere near done with WW2 stuff
4 Likes
Not for the Soviet.
There is no need for jets.
2 Likes
Ah yeah I suppose you’re right.
Eitherway. There are 1942/43 jet choices already so we can surely add something.
Plenty of experimental weapons that never saw action in enlisted already.
1 Like
I don’t play games for gameplay “needs”, i play them because i enjoy historical content. Not per see 100 percent accuracy but well over 1500 produced jets in ww2 and well over 600 operational of those, i’d say they’d make a good addition.
My disinterest is not due to accuracy. It is due to the gameplay. At current jets just don’t fit into low altitude combat imo … and that is what enlisted is.
I am not against jets, as long as they’re not going to make current classic BR5 planes obsolete.
2 Likes
Plenty German jet configurations in the strike/anti tank roll.
With Pershings and M2 Carbines I’d say the max is pretty much reached in other branches of what we saw in ww2.
I’d say jets is a good step in the near future.
Feel free to disagree. That is my opinion.
I’d be happy with a higher Br for them.
Anything but the P-59 wouldn’t be maneuverable. Many others could be added with either a2a or a2g loadouts. Think Ar234 without cannons and only bombs. Me262 narwhal with only a 57mm canon or regular Me262 with only 20mm cannons for aircraft.
make a br6 for jets and other cracked weapons like the an/m2 stinger
2 Likes
Helicopters first please!
1 Like
haha ok, ok. I’d prefer jets but I’d be happy with either.
1 Like
lol, I think you posted this RIGHT before the event was announced right? Nice timing.