Espacenet – search results
here you are;]
this one is fun too
Espacenet – search results
1920-30s tank logic be like:
have you ever seen polish mad max TKS tankette variation?
Its just beautiful
Yes I have seen these in pictures. They actualy hunted panzers in the of the invasion of Poland by Germany.
yep, sadly we had like only twenty of TKS and TK3 variants with instaled nkm wz. FK (this sweet 20mm autocannon).
Despite german propaganda after the invasion of poland, polish army even in inferiority regarding equipment and veichle was able to deal a huge damage to the Wehrmacht and luftwaffe
I don’t doubt that.
Back a mouse into a corner and he’ll attack a lion
Early war german tanks had very shit armour (thankfully)
could be done much better though. But in ayes of our officials war was sepossed to start like in 42-43. Modernization plans, new equipment, fortyfications, magazines and operation plan and many more were just not ready in 39.
also there was no money. it was like really bad xd
Ww2 german tank outiside the stug they suck, too much overenginered to a point if a piece in the tank broke withaut that specific part they cant be repaired
stugs best cost-effective tank of probably whole war (could perhaps compete here with sherman couse sherman was compatible with f anything, every single role on battlefield)
I’d say pz4 and pz3 were ok. They weren’t amazing but ok. (Pz3 having amazing soft parameters.)
But late war those tanks were mostly obsolite and their replacement was shit.
Also tiger in it’s early days was good. (If we don’t mind it would fit on hardly any bridge.)
Shermans could be made into anything and were.
Personlally I dislike that ww2 enthusiasts can be labeled as:
Imo all sides had good and bad stuff and this should be pointed out.
TLDR concider me biased
LOOOL historical accurate OMG
Sherman prestige was their hull, you can simply remove the turret and make him an APC or an mobile AA, Howitzer ecc…
Exactly.
Magic of the Sherman.
Its the same as an AK.
all what was on hull of pz3 or pz4 was nice. Assault Guns coud take bigger cannon though bc no need of big ass turret.
I would even argue that f nashorn was good idea. It was build on mixed hull pz3/pz4 and was rather easy to produce bc of that and not so bad in maintaining. Had nice scores on eastern front. We could say only bc soviets never had there air supiriority but in this situation it did good(you know, open hull vs bomb shrapnels, it hurts)
Recently I’ve listened to a podcast of two historians about it.
Overall seems to be good but neglected construction.
I mean come on. If something has Pak43 and 24t of weight it has to be nice.