not good on landing im afraid 
It will be ok, you just need to come in at the correct angle at a slowish speed and the carrier will catch you
1 Like
i was gold rank 1156
now im 57
i ragequit sometimes cause im grinding pacific axis
so I agree
They are in fact longer didnât they?
Those should be equal as for seaplanes there.
Most people donât even consider landing an option, being fair.
Considering you need to slow down to land, then take the time to take off, but not if you fly through an ammo point, I donât think the air respawn is far enough away to actually be slower than using carriers.
1 Like
@DieJagdente im an adult, but i fell the need to ask an adult to stay with me in meantine i read this, please do something
The D3A1 tail gunner doesnât fire, despite max perks, known bug, doesnât help itâs performance⌠hoping devs fix soon, will help I think.
D3A1 sucks overall.
Itâs a bloody disgrace, I just played five games in Pacific and those dastardly sneaky Japanese won three of them. How dare they!
Going to call for an inquiry 
It all comes down to two things, 1. How good the players are 2. How many deserters you had on your team.
2 Likes
M1903A3 with 8x sights vs Type 99 with 2.5x sightsâŚ
Kinda sad how the final level 18 sniper is completely outclassed by the level 0 one on the Allied side
Sure it gets a clip reload and a slightly faster fire rate, but if you canât even see the other guy shooting at you, then you canât really take advantage of said reload and fire rate 
Canât find stuff on any better optical sights for the Type 97 and 99, so maybe a captured M1903A3 for the Axis and a captured Type 97 AT rifle for the Allies to even things out? 