Japan is in dire need of a high BR anti-tank weapon

Japan only has anti-tank weapons up to BR2. This becomes extremely inadequate at BR5 when most other countries have access to AT weapons with roughly twice the penetration power of Japan’s current weapons.

There appears to be a 105mm recoilless rifle used by Japan, although I cannot find photos of it on the English speaking internet.

25 Likes

No other faction has access to lunge mine with 180mm pene.

But I agree Japan needs better AT launcher.

1 Like

type 97 grenade,200 mm

Sure, those are good, but they require you to be literally touching the tank, and that’s not so practical if the tank has infantry around it or inside the grey zone

6 Likes

Ya’ll seem to have no problem killing my Jumbo and Pershing with the Type 5

1 Like

Oh yes, lets give Japan also a German Panzerschreck - apparently this issue wont get solved otherways lol

4 Likes

It’s been suggested before; just have a crossbow fired lunge mine. Instant best AT.

except that still requires some degree of aiming on a launcher with no sights, whereas the american panzershreck can pretty much just lolpen every JP tank except the ho-ri

1 Like

Ok? Should’ve made a toob with sights. Hard to get proper elevation with the M9 cause there’s no ranging etches yet you don’t hear me complaining

yeah at least that HAS sights and you’re not just aiming down a PVC pipe

2 Likes

There’s also a 9cm Type 4 rocket and a rifle grenade for the Japanese AT gun

3 Likes

There’s also a recoilless launcher with an 81mm shaped charge too. I’m having trouble finding the 105mm which I swear I remember seeing someone post about some time ago but I’m having trouble finding it.

japanese-81mm-recoilless-rifle-the-first-such-weapon-made-v0-cchrbesdb9ua1
1561617117_bezotkatnoe-81-mm-orudie
(The 81mm recoilless)

3 Likes

image
It is too big for a soldier to carry.

1 Like

The M9’s sight is infinitely better, not since it’s good but since the type 5 doesn’t have a sight at all.
Tho I will say the M9’s sight isn’t the worst.

Hasnt stoped the devs from giving the type 97 ATR to infantry XD
Even though calling it an ATR is already not correct as it is more like a small scale AT gun.

1 Like

So what? This thing is way bigger than it.
Moreover the type 97 at least looks carriable by its design.
The 105mm recoilless rifle is basically like an artillery on a carriage.

type 5 is just lunge mine with less step lol

Yeah instead of giving the ofenrohr to the allies they should have given it to japan.