J2M3 should not be in the same team as ki84

Suggestions
1

QQ_1733044375941
QQ_17330443759411266×740 191 KB

This is a pretty stupid mistake. J2M3 is a fighter belonging to IJN, while Ki-84 is a fighter belonging to IJA.
Anyone with a little knowledge of history will know that the conflict between IJN and IJA is very deep, and the fighters of IJA and IJN even have completely different control methods.
As a result, J2M3 and Ki-83 are in the same squad in the game, which is simply bullshit.

Based on the gameplay, the Japanese camp currently lacks teams that can send out more vehicles, which leads to the loss of vehicles, especially aircraft, in high BR battles. They will find it difficult to fill this position for a while.

DF’s poor work efficiency makes me not expect them to fill these gaps by adding new weapons.

At least, fix this stupid low-level mistake.
If J2M3 and Ki-84 have different squads, belonging to IJN and IJA respectively, it will also be very beneficial for the Japanese camp at BR5. They can use J2M3 to fill this gap after losing Ki-84.

QQ_1733044819843

“Battles are similar in scale to historical battles ”
Haha, so funny

10 Likes
2

The game is not historically accurate since the introduction of development trees and symmetrical balance of sides.

When there was a campaign system, battles were asymmetrical and the Axis powers were in a losing position.

These changes were forced by players, players also forced DarkFlow to normalize weapons, impenetrable walls, low explosion damage and so on and so forth…

2 Likes
3

Thanks for the information. I am surprised to know that this is indeed the case. They should have done their homework correctly.

4

after the merge it’s healthier to just ignore what the air squadrons are supposed to mean, it’s the same problem in other factions where even the nationalities are wrong.