Thank you for your post.
I agree in principle but as others have said the issue here is that China really shouldnt be in the game at current.
Now I would strongly welcome China to Enlisted, I just mean when weve only got Burma I really dont like seeing Chinese soldiers landing on D Day or fighting in the desert.
But in future Id welcome all these ideas including the ‘box cannon’ which I believe is what China called the C96 Mauser?
Now in the interest of constructive criticism I would suggest giving Chinese squads standard American uniforms for now rather than specific Chinese.
That way when the event/premium squads are in maps other than Burma they will just be Chinese or ‘Asian’-American soldiers which did absolutely exist (there were even Japanese-American soldiers fighting in Europe).
@Admiral_Wenli I like the idea of Manchuria. Ive suggested many times before adding China as a proper sub faction of USSR.
- Adds China to the game which attracts a large playerbase
- Allows the long needed Japan v USSR
- Adds variety for Japan and USSR especially (China instead of just bleak snow maps)
- Fills out the USSR tech tree
- USSR already has American and German tech in the tree so it would be fine having China with some USA/Germany tech (people forget that while China did use American/British tech for example they were often different to what the Allies actually used, eg P66 and CW21 fighters were not used by the USAAF)
@OggeKing I dont really mind the order but yes 100% I want UK+Commonwealth and Italy+Other Axis Nations as proper factions.
I cannot agree more Ogge about the unnecessary and illogical hate against UK-Commonwealth/Italy trees.
As you, me and many others have repeated so many times USA and UK would queue together in most cases so it would not be splitting the playerbase. It’s just separating the trees to allow more space instead of messy folders and DF can just add more content overall.
Personally Ive always hoped that this would happen so that we can get UK/Commonwealth specific maps in future, i.e basically anything pre 1943 like France, Greece, Norway, Tobruk.
It is insane to ignore over half of WWII. Same goes for US specific battles like the Philippines or Okinawa.
I also agree Hungary would be cool to see. One of the false arguments against UK-Commonwealth and Italy trees is waaahh not enough content.
If the UK were actually allowed to have all their tech theyd have plenty of content, especially with the Commonwealth.
Myself personally Id also add Greece and Norway or any other small Allied nation for further tech. Not that Greece or Norway had a huge amount of stuff but its still more tech as options.
Likewise Italy, add Hungary, Romania, Finland, Croatia and Slovakia. Plenty of tech to draw from.
Another thing: Its funny because people whinge that new tech trees (eg France) would need prototypes to get to BR V. Now personally I would just not have trees go to BR V if they cant make it.
But here’s the neat part:
The same people who scream that UK-Commonwealth and Italy shouldnt exist because theyd need potentially some prototypes or copypaste (like 1) to get to BR V… are the same people who constantly defend and call for more BS prototypes and copy paste (eg Japanese Tiger tank).
Make it make sense.
@Chris_Vector yep, exactly. Clearly the haters dont know much about WWII given the amount of times the Allies and Axis fought alongside each other.
Faction specific maps like I describe above arent even in the game yet so DF could create new UK-Commonwealth and Italy trees tomorrow and the playerbase wouldnt be split because the queues would stay the same.
?