There are many suggestions in this community, but are they all acceptable?
Dear developers, Thanks for working hard, but maybe it’s nicer to consider more……
Some suggestions are good, but dear developers always implement them too much!
This is how some developers ‘S O L V E’ problems↓
OP bombers - weaken them for several times! (No one uses them now. Hmm, satisfied? This means that developers waste time developing bomber features completely)
OP HMG - even unable to penetrate a wooden wall! (H I S T O R I C A L. Really?)
OP Tank Camping - let M5A1 kill the tiger! (H I S T O R I CA L) Many planes can kill tanks in a few seconds! (H I S T O R I C A L)
Some proposals obviously have many opponents, but it seems that developers just ignore them and go their own way. (Who likes MKB and MG42 in Moscow? Or Federov in WW2? )
So I reiterate the voting system I have proposed!
In addition, there should also be a vote on the previous updates - because there are always some players who are always happy to see the update announcement and praise the developers until they open the game and feel disappointed.
Developers should not always improve based on data: data is dead and players are alive. Data is a good reference, but it is too mechanical and rigid to rely only on them!
At the same time, to weaken OP, developers should introduce new mechanisms and functions to balance from a historical perspective, rather than just weaken their data so that historical accuracy is gone!!!
And this is also nice!↓