It is important to have different maps, not just various sections of the same map

I have been playing the Pacific quite a lot but I still won’t be able to tell you the difference between Tanaru River and Crocodile Creek maps, just like any other map - they look the same, they feel the same, they essentially are the same, simply different areas of the same big map.

The feeling of novelty and variety is very important.
When we play Moscow, we see villages, towns, monasteries, quarries and working settlements. They are all (mostly) distinct and look different (even down to time of the year, like in the forestry).

I know Moscow probably had much more development time and care, and I appreciate that (as I personally value Moscow over the Pacific), but despite being geographically smaller than the whole Pacific ocean, it has more map variety.

I truly hope the Pacific doesn’t suffer the faith of Stalingrad (where all maps = 5 nearby buildings and 2 crossroads) and we see completely new maps added, but honestly I am sceptical.

What I expected to see in the Pacific before it launched:

Iwo Jima

Jungle map (Solomon Islands, something like we have now)

Island hopping map (with a lot of marine vehicles)

Higgins boat/LVT action Invasion type of map

Different weather variants, storms, etc

I know I quote a lot of BFV, and that’s a whole different budget, but just as reference for variety concept.

In Enlisted, I feel like I’m always playing this map

And I don’t even know what’s it called when I play it.

1 Like

Because is the same map, guadalcanal have 3 different apporoching roout wo can end at

  • Western trench
  • the mansion
  • japanese HQ

And all way have the church as middle point

Gavtu is only the airfield

And yes, i love the map bulding very well done, but as always is the same one map over and over like stalingrad

Yes, that’s my point.
At least in Berlin we have Berlin area + Zeelow area, in Moscow we have Monastery area and Forestry area (different color palettes, environments, seasons of the year, etc)

Tunisia, Normandy, Stalingrad and now Pacific are just 1 big map split into routes.

Tunisia have better area is the last campaign with a decent work on the map

At release it have

The fortress
The small fortress villagge
The big city with bazar
The oasis

Stalingrad is the worst offender when it comes to “different maps” using various sections of the same map. Atleast Berlin have sections that do feel different to each other(Koenigsplatz area, Brandenburg Gate-Reich Chancellery, Lehrter Bahnhof and Seelow Heights).

We need inland maps for Pacific whether its deeper into the jungles of Guadalcanal/Makin, some urban combat in places like Batan, Lots of fortifications like Peleliu, Tarawa, Okinawa, etc. Still remember what kind of Pacific campaign shown from the likes of Call of Duty World at War and Medal of Honor Pacific Assault.

There are trenches, airfield, tiny islands, ruins, village ,jetty, indigenous people hut in pacific.

Lol what argument is this? You count in the area of ocean?

You expect too much from a brand new campaign, they need time to make more map.

This is basically the gavutu island map.

It’s all on the same terrain.
I’m talking about different islands and biomes.

I cound the fact that Moscow region is the same biome, and Guadalcanal to Iwo Jima takes 4341 km, offering opportunities for variety.

Stalingrad has been out for 7 months.
I don’t know if the Pacific will get much love after launch.

Damn shame Stalingrad didn’t get a new map again with the recent update. This is just pathetic considering right now is the 80th anniversary of the Battle of Stalingrad. We still have yet to get a single winter map there either.

We have Two different island, they both have unique terrain.

So what? The campaign now only have map in guadal canal campaign.

Interesting.
It all feels like the same beach to me so far.

So exactly that, I am of the opinion that variety and diversity of biomes and landscapes is crucial for gameplay experience.