yea, its just that there are a lot of little tweaks happening here and there in the background, like the T34 was crazy OP when berlin started, very high survivability mix with a bad dmg model and the turret glitch. Now it seems to be a bit lacking, just a bit tho, since it cant penetrate the panthers front armor, meaning it need to aim for the turret, while the panther can destroy the T34 easily everywhere.
The T50 also seems “better now” tho still sometimes hard to hit its weakspots.
Not sure bout that. The mgs still seem to get in the way a lot.
Well, I just unlocked the grb and as such don’t have much experience with it, but the PIAT seems to have about double the damage while also having better sights and being easier to use. The grb seems to have strange projectile drop. It almost feels like it’s still being propelled after launch for a little while, like it is a rocket. It is difficult for me to hit things. Also don’t play as planes too much so I don’t really know to much about plane balance.
Didnt say its “good” now, just better : )
If you think this community is savage, don’t play war thunder!
Its rather frustrating isn’t it ? to be honest its more a player issues not a game balance issue.
Its going to good its late tier gear 
people cry too much
yep XD i agree people just like to bitch about the drum magazine smg’s because they feel offended due to it apparently being “unfair”
There kids complaining about anything and everything probably because they die too much. But its enlisted you die a lot anyway.
Thing is if these kids complaining on the forums and reddit the devs will probably think there is an issue when there obviously is not and nerf that thing into the ground to the point where its not worth using.
Its a player learning curve issue not a game balance issue.
Also welcome to the forums! ^.^
Its cause GRB is like an missile ^^ Im still learning in the range with the pistol but ive noticed you can even go down to the handle as an mark for longer ranges and can travel quite far.
The GRB rifle how ever from how i recall its sight the iron sight on top is up to 25m or a bit less…Close range
Then next middle line us up to 50 something give or take.
Under ring is around aprox 125-150
Then you can go down to the middle of the plate for longer shots. This i usually combine with marking the tank and sighting in on the plate then i memorize where i shot last time. Then add or subtract if i miss.
I can’t seem to udjust the range like I can with the PIAT, I am using it in Moscow so maybe that is why. (I think the Tunisia one is different from the on in Moscow).
The one in Moscow is the one im reffering to when it comes to the rifle. The pistol im using rn is the one in Normandy. Havent tried the PIAT yet so cant compare for now ^^ But it sounds and look powerful
From my experience;
Sturmpistol<grb<PIAT=panzerfaust
Sturpistol isn’t bad… but you need a lot of practice with it.
Grp seems hard to use but haven’t had enough experience with it.
PIAT is a beast that can take out panthers, probably has the best sights and is the easiest to use.
Panzerfaust has more power but is harder to use (less range and worse sights).
My opinion and experience with playing.
Sturmpistol is rly sht compared to GRB believe me ^^ Reason for this is that they have the same ammo and punch the same. But the pistol has such long reload time and less ammo that you barely can be effective with it. But also since the Pistol faces harder tanks to and some you cant even/barely pen in the front…GRB just melts thru all the tanks everywhere in Moscow even the feared T-50 on front at long ranges. Sure sometimes you might miss a bit but its rare on impact
Just give me back my old Moscow and Df must finally read and understand their own advertisment again (or change it) and we all can be best friends.
Playerbase is horrible at the game
And even worse at giving honest unbiased feedback
Ofc. It’s the same with dicks. Mine is awesome but some people really don’t have beautiful and large ones. But there are some girls who want to play with the sad ones 
I’m one of these girls. I would always prefer my beloved bolt action rifles over any semi automatic rifle.
yeah, I mean there is truly too much bias going on, which is why Im trying to focus on “complaining” about axis gear, since as an axis main its the only stuff im capable to really criticize.
Like I wouldnt straight up say “FG42” OP, but I usually say " FG42 OP compared to G43.
How stronger would you say the FG42 is to M2 ? comparing the G43 to Garand ?
Ive only picked them up a couple of times but havent got them long enough to say.
Personally G43 and Garand i think is the same effectiveness since ive tried them both way more
Well the FG kills faster but only has a 20 round magazine, which issnt a problem because it reloads very fast, also the FG has more recoil so I guess they are not too far performance wise to each other, at least up close, however if you have a fully upgraded FG 42 with the less recoil perk, you will out perform the M2 in mid range.
Now if you happen to be using the FG 42 II tho, that thing is literally a god gun and comparable to MGs before the nerf.
M1 Garand and G43… well dont know both seem comparable to me, G43 has a bitt bigger mag with a also insanely fast reload speed…
You know comparing rifles towards each other issnt that easy, since there isnt much that differs to begin with. G41 for example has a very bad reload time, but still is a semi auto like all the other rifles.
Sure the Lee enfield has a bigger Magazine than the Kar98, but in the end does it matter all that much? If anything you could compare the “berlin axis boltaction with a detachable 10 round magazine” with the “gold order soviet one-round in chamber rifle from moscow” and say one of them is much better than the other… but in the end we are talking about the ability to kill 2 soldiers in 5 seconds which issnt worth talking about, at least compared to who can wipe an entire squads faster with what select fire weapon.
But isnt that a sniper rifle well mkb type of sniper ? ^^ But yeah by looking at the counterpart Garand sniper and having ppl saying the FG42 is an OP gun i can understand the setback there. To early for me to say rn so ill try not to speculate around that subject to much until ive experienced Normandy long enough.
True that since they are part of an string of event that has pros and cons in different parts as well to try even it up. Well to me it was pretty simple to compare them but yeah youre right. Usually they fall even like in Moscow as an Example. Russians got more powerful BAs but came with slow mantle movement and reload which Germans came in with slight lesser power but more effective followup shots. How ever Russian Semi Actions where slight better overall then the Germans in that campaign in my opinion
Ty for your input btw
yea I used to play with the FG42 II sniper on normady, it was so overpowered that I was able to kill ppl at the beaches faster than gray zone camping tanks, it was literally a Kar 98 sniper rifle with a 20 round fast reload magazine, now all automatic weapons got nerfed hard in their accuracy meaning hitting things past 100 meters means you gotta pray to RNGesus a lot.
Anyways, you can detach the scope from the normandy version and use it as a better standard FG 42 since it has much less recoil. Also the FG42 II is a standard rifle in berlin, and yea its a big upgrade from the regular FG 42 with the angled pistol grip.
You just say that cause the amount of engineer players dropped since CBT and Normandy attracts freakos.