as the title question
Depends on what you’re trying to achieve. I prefer molotovs because they last longer and can offer very good defensive attacks, while WP grenades are good for clearing out objectives they can cause a lot more damage to allies
1 Like
No, even after the nerf WP granade are better than molotov as AOE weapon, plus they can burn infantry as molotov do
The only pro of use molotov is for burn tank engine deck
2 Likes
If you want fire and you want it on impact moltovs are better, the fuse on wp gets annoying and it can’t deal with tanks that well
2 Likes
Molotov has safer denial effect though. You can literally block just the entrance you want without giving your allies eye cancer in the process.
2 Likes
No, you can’t go wrong with any grenade atm unless it’s an impact grenade. Those became obsolete after the lowering of the weapon before throw “feature”.
1 Like
noticed that too, in fact i have like 15 impact nades in storage.
althoug i kinda like that ur guy needs to lower rifle to throw nade
phosphor nades can damage tanks?
They can kill the crew of things like the m13 and ta se but if you land it in a tanks engine you can damage the engine with the generated fire
1 Like
If there is a drawback to white phosphorus bullets, it is that the bot throws them back at you.
Molotovs are almost impossible to throw back, which makes them excellent for immediate response.
If you are sneaking up on an enemy CP and want to clear a bot-packed building, and you have white phosphorus rounds, you have to wait a few seconds in front of a door or window before throwing them. Molotov can immediately throw it in and give chase with a submachine gun or other weapon.
1 Like
I’d say the Molotov is more of an honorable choice than phosphorus grenades. Phosphorus grenades are the most annoying of all the grenades to use in game, both for the user and the recipient.
2 Likes