As a German main I fell sorry for the soviet fellas. My Tiger II knocks easily every IS-2 tank all the time. They lack a proper tank to face the Tiger.
IS-3 would be stong enough.
They donāt really need anything when theyāre better than us in almost every area except for tanks. The only exception is when they have most of our anti-tank weapons, which makes our tank advantage irrelevant.
And the AI that I was using for this I had to go through so many iterations because it was having a heart attack so I took what it gave me which was somewhat logical.
You joked and laughed yourself, didnāt you?)
is-2 is an excellent opponent for KT
specifically, the 1944 is-2 holds the kvk 43 with its forehead
And the tower has good ricocheting spots.
In the competent hands of the is-2, death to all tanks)
The issue of application by individual players should be considered separately.
I sincerely do not understand the nonsense about the introduction of is-3 and t-44/100
Thereās nothing to it.
Faust was a massive trophy and suited the Soviet army very well.
It was even adopted into service
As for the spread in the troops, he went up to the level of a company and a platoon
What indicates a high number on the Soviet side
everything is historical, and your whining is just ignorance)
Then whereās our capture PTSR or PPSH in the tech tree then
Ask the developers.
We somewhat tried in the past but it was ignored and we even had proper counters to it but they were ignored
And you did the right thing.
If you listen to you, youāll leave in a daze the whole game
Iām not really sure adding the IS-3 would be a good idea. One of the major problems with the Tiger 2 is how hard it is to kill and the IS-3, being stuck with the same gun with the same painfully slow rof as the IS-2, would not solve that issue. However it is extremely heavily armoured making it extremely difficult for the Germans to kill it (honestly I wouldnāt be surprised if the IS-3 was outright immune from the front to anything less than the long 88). So I worry all adding the IS-3 would do is spread the misery.
At least itās better than being stuck in a nightmare where Americans carpet bomb everything and for whatever reason the Soviets have everything which is just one step above the Germans.
Itās historical, isnāt it?
As the Soviet mains say when you suggest removing armor buffs:
āNO, DONāT TOUCH IT, ITāS A FACTION FEATURE!ā
For the Americans and their allies, the obvious main feature is the best aviation in the game. The Germans have their tanks, and the Soviets have some of the best infantry weapons plus body armor that gives 10% damage resistance. If you want to give them the IS-3, it should only happen after their infantry weapons get buffed and armor is added to ALL factionsāor the protection bonus is removed entirely, leaving it as purely cosmetic.
Donāt you even start with that when this game is getting further and further away from that concept and the Soviets are using guns they should not even be using and prototypes which werenāt even feasible.
AT weapons are in no way something that can nullify one sideās tank advantage due to the simple fact that they have quite short ranges and require the soft squishy human to get in LOS with the target which, depending on the specific circumstances, is basically suicide.
is 3 the same as jagtigr
Complete garbage on our If youāre worried about the frontal I will make you happy that our tankers are 90% hand-held and cannot use their cars to their full advantage and play to their strengths. And the cards will just bury these And the maps will bury these tanks
Is-3 will become fodder for infantry with Faust 100 and offenrors
Thatās impossible because the Soviet and the allies Hate the concept of equality
Because you canāt let the fascist bastard bend over
Paratrooper nonsense and dealing with veteran players but for the casuals yes
We have to decide if this is a historical reenactment or a full-on fantasy ā we canāt have it both ways.
I choose the absolute domination of the USSR.
I donāt care about the rest.