nice joke
Fact arent joke.
We play in difference game?
PZ 4 J have MG34 as mg and they 2 against 1 dt at t34.
Of course PZ 4J better against infantry.
t34 has better mobility and godly better turret rotation
dosent matter what kind mg you have if you cant aim with it
Bruh I just want to dustfree my compâŚ
Okay boys, cut it out. Last warning.
2 Likes
I didnât start it and I didnât intend to continue it.So thatâs all right.
In Berlin?Where or big distance or 1 row?T-34 not have so much better mobility and turret rotation not needed on corridor maps.
Oh - are the Soviets getting the T-V now??
4 Likes
Somehow the first T34 is the best tank until tiger 
some people always ignore how great their own faction is while crying about everyone else
1 Like
im waiting for IS2 OP âNerfâ king tiger 2 cant pen him frontally fix! ASAP!
Or adding a maus.Itâs historical!The Aryan skill should not be infringed!
weak
If they did get he IS-2 then the Tiger2 should have no trouble penetrating it - the P-4 would be in difficulty - even more than now, none of hte other tanks should have a problem at the tranges in the game.
And the massive HE shell should be pretty well balanced by the low rate of fire and small ammo load of only 29 rounds total IMO. I seem to remember reading somewhere that he standard load was 8 AP and 20 HE, but I imagine that would have varied if more tanks were expected to be seen.
Most peole forget, or do not realise, that the IS-2 was not optimsed fot anti-tank warfare at all - it was a âbreakthroughâ tank designed to help with the assault of heavily defended localites - so Berlin is prety much what it was made for.
The Soviets had the option of equipping the IS-2 with a 100mm gun - which is a better anti-tank gun than the 122mm, and did trials, but decided not to because the 122mm had âbetter all round capabilitiesâ - ie a better HE round. The 100m gun would have allowed 35 rounds to be carreis instead of 28, although the extra would have been hard to reach in combat.
I know but you know poeple love complain