Are you making the argument that “Dunkirk” was a bad movie ?
I support Korea but not Vietnam. RS2 is just too damn good.
Why not Vietnam?
Explain please
I want to fly in my Huey and CAS some communists please!
They will just mostly get the existed German , Allies, Japan, Soviet equipment anyway. It will still be boring.
Because there is enough competition with RS2 excluding the bots.
Korea so far has not been really touched.
2 Likes
Read carefully, I am not talking about balance, I am talking about unique weapon.
The Pz.IV’s armor-piercing rounds can still penetrate most of the S.35’s frontal area. And because of the explosive bullets, one-kill is easy. But Somua is different. Because of the armor-piercing shells, the Pz. You need to hit the IV at least 2-3 times to get a kill. The reload time is also 4.2 seconds and 5.2 seconds based on War Thunder, so Somua will give you 1 second more. It’s not just tank warfare. Emphasize, the 47mm HE shell is not strong. On the other hand, the Pz.IV C’s 75mm HE rounds would be hell for infantry.
Fair point
Does RS2 actually have players to play with?
Does it have CAS, armor and slower gameplay than enlisted?
Kinda interested in getting it.
Just like RO2 but hear that game is dead
And thats why france would suck
You quote my pz3e sentence, but showing pz4c against those tank?
Asymmetrical balance, S35 trade fire power for armor. Pz 4c have better firepower, but weak armor.
Why giving France unique weapon will suck?
Dunkerque wasn’t a good movie, and I’m tired to pretend it was.
1917 was a way better movie.
Dunkerque was long… too long.
This movie is the war version of waiting in a Disneyland queue.
20min: they are waiting to leave
40min: they are still waiting to leave
60min: they waiting to… oh look a Stuka.
80min: they are waiting to leave
100min: they left.
106min: post credit text saying “the war is bad and a lot of people left in Dunkerque”
We still need it in Enlisted tho.
The Pz.III can still penetrate most of the front of the H-39. With APHE, the crew is killed at once, as shown in the following picture. However, the bullets fired by the H-39 are different. First of all, there are only armor-piercing bullets, and the Pz. Even if you hit III, only 1 or 2 of your crew will die. By the way, the Pz.III has a crew of 5 people.
You don’t seem to understand. Both gloves can be considered similar. However, the difference in survivability between the two is too great. It’s incomparable.
Because giving germany the same weapon will suck
Turning it into PVE
Enlisted Post Pen effect is different from War Thunder. The German 37mm in Moscow, have weak post pen.
I disagree
Their use of real planes, effects - the look of authenticity with a slower less action focused story was a lot more entertaining than a usual more action based movie.
it is not PVE… there are still players, just there is big player imbalance. instead of 10v10 we get 6v10 and out of those 6, 3 are console players that perform on same level as bots.
and for things to be equalized we need:
- grind rework (unify nation grind in one tree)
- MM rework so you dont get players with bolties and low level vehicles vs full autos and high level vehicles
- fixing playerbase imbalance. various proposals were put on how to fix that, from bonus xp to weaker side, to bonus xp for auto join or other solutions
and adding any new campaign makes game worse cause it further exacerbate problems that need to be fixed.
Those nation you mentioned will also get same copy paste weapon anyway.
By the same logic as yours, France is as weak as Germany. I don’t think you understand the problem.
Thats why i said cold war was better 