@118645616 AB41 is best vehicle. With a close contender being the t60.
3 Likes
Maybe.
I still like the M13.
lol, true, what a fool.
Learn how to use it. Is that not clear?
It’s not a trash weapon, why is it that most people are doing just fine with it? Just coincidence I guess?
I didn’t say “skill issue”, I said learn how to use it. It doesn’t really require much skill. Don’t put words in my mouth.
Also, I have it, I don’t use it that much because Axis Normandy isn’t really that fun anymore and I’d rather just use the Kreighoff. That’s personal opinion.
You have the best battle rifle in the game with a grenade launcher attached, and yet you’re complaining because the Allies got an MG that is only situationally useable. I don’t know what I’m even supposed to say to that.
2 Likes
You said learn to use it like I’m so dumb to use a grenade launcher and you still say you didn’t say “skill issue”, you’re just playing with words.
Yeah, it is such a good weapon that I almost never see someone using it and, logical.
Where the hell did I complained about the “best battle rifle in the game” ? I just said 1 or 2 more magazine would be better, did I complained about recoil or damage? Did I asked a nerf for allies para?
I don’t care about your grenade launcher like most of players, if I can trade him for 2 more magazine I would instantly do it.
And at the same time the whole Allies “heroes” came here as ever “Germany suffer”, “deal with it” or even with their hypocrite argument “I’m playing the axis too”, it only remind me the racist people saying “I have a black friend” as argument and in the meantime theses same players are totally OK for a sigh buff, an ammo buff and still want a recoil buff for Vickers but when it’s about FG “Germany suffer” 
And by the way stop exaggerating, “the best battle rifle in the game” is the AVT40 then the FG2 II without scope but not at all the FG42 I, I know you are an Ally main but theses liar starting to be embarrassing.
3 Likes
Dude, stop putting words in my mouth. I never said or implied that you were dumb. I said learn to use it. Not knowing how to properly use a grenade launcher doesn’t make you dumb.
That’s subjective, because I see them all the time.
I have no problem with that, give it more mags. But here you are complaining about the Vickers and how people were “crying” before the sight got changed.
Just like the 10+ posts in the last few days from the spoiled Axis mains who went way off topic and started blaming Allied players for the player base shifting.
Then you’d just be left with a normal FG42.
Not even close to the same argument. If someone actually plays axis as opposed to having a friend that does for example, that logic falls apart.
You don’t buff a sight, it never got an ammo buff, and the recoil doesn’t need to be changed. It’s an aircraft gun that’s designed to be mounted, not fired from the shoulder.
Hahaha nope!
Proof? I’ve maxed Axis in Stalingrad and almost Berlin, as well as being lvl 20 in Moscow. I do play Allies slightly more than axis because I like their equipment more, but that hardly makes me an allied main.
Speaking of which, this is exactly how Axis mains talk:
Yes btw, this is normal.
2 Likes
I’m not complaining about allies para like I want a nerf for them, I’m just comparing the difference between the stuff and the buff they received.
I made a new post only because the German para are playable since Friday and the posts of feedback are made the same day, just before the week when devs don’t even look at all the forums, since now all of them are drowned.
Still prefer a normal FG42 with more ammo than this bad accessory just for using something “original”.
It’s close because the racist can just know someone and talk him 1 time in the month and say I have black friend to defend him like an allies main (or even axis) can say I play the 2 side just because he is playing 1 game or 2 in the month as axis and 500000 as allies
You understood what I mean, you still play with words. The change of sight on this weapon changed from trash weapon to really good weapon, it got an ammo buff at the last minute it’s even mentioned in patch pote, it’s not a coincidence, at the beginning they had just 100/0 and now 100/100
Yep 
I have maxed Stalingrad and Normandy too, so I play the 2 side? What’s your other campaign level, you are maxed on every allies level and you maxed only Stalingrad because it has the turbo leveling and Berlin because of the German best equipment, that’s all lol.
Yes I’m an axis main, I’m not hypocritical like more than half on this forum saying “I’m playing the 2 side” but everytime an axis post is made, they are hating like ever.
2 Likes
The Vickers did not receive a buff.
- The original sight was completely unusable, which is why it was changed.
- The recoil has not been buffed, nor does it need to be.
- Every weapon in the game has at least one spare mag, even machine guns. So the Vickers receiving an extra mag is not a buff, it’s bringing to the level of other machine guns.
Yeah, when the forums are drowned in complaints and the individual posts quickly go off topic, the devs tend to ignore it.
sigh.
No, that’s too broad of a statement. Unless you’re talking about a specific person that I’m not aware of, that logic relies on the assumption that every allied player behaves in this way, playing 50000 matches as Allies and 2 as Axis.
That logic still falls apart because it only takes one counter exemple to prove you wrong. I can simply say I’m an allied player that’s played more than 2 matches as Axis, and boom, case closed.
This is just factually wrong, and you can find out for yourself by playing for the Vickers for two seconds. It doesn’t matter how good or bad the sight is because the recoil is borderline uncontrollable (and I already stated why it should be):
It can only be used at close range or in short, 1-5 round bursts. Anything else, and those bullets are going nowhere. Go to the practice range and shoot the Vickers dry without trying to control the recoil. You’ll be staring right up in the sky before the mag is even empty.
The FG42 on the other hand, can 1 tap reliably even at medium range. You don’t even need full auto.
Again. This is normal for all weapons in game.
Wrong. Stop making false assumptions about me.
I’m max Allies in Normandy and Pacific, and lvl 23 in Tunisia. I don’t play USSR at all atm. That’s a fairly even split.
I went for Stalingrad because it had cool weapons like the Kiraly, MKB, MP717, etc. I went for Berlin and Moscow because I think it has cool maps. Gear is mostly repeat from Normandy and Stalingrad so I didn’t care there.
So since you’ve opened the door for making assumptions, I’m going to assume that you only played Normandy because it was a bot farm for the Axis, and now you’re mad at Allied players for all the high level Axis guys leaving to Berlin.
1 Like
But It was the historically sight used by british infantry, they just had to rework a bit the sight, not to change by something that wasn’t even used by infantry.
Yeah but at least you can see something and shooting with burst work well. The contrary example is look at the jap Type 96, this weapon have really good stats, very low recoil and spread for me it’s one of the best MG but the sight is so bad make it a middle weapon because you can’t see a shit
No atm I’m playing axis Normandy and 2/3 weeks ago I was playing Axis Tunisia but it was too much 6/8 Marshall per game against a team of bot.
I really don’t like easy win games since it’s boring that’s why I’m playing Normandy but Tunisia is too much atm
1 Like
so do you know why the kreighoff has 20/80 instead of 20/40 of the FG42, FG42 GL, sniper FG42, and infantry FG42II
why axis main always downplay their equipment?
the fuck you wnat more from the fg42II with proper perks you can tap fire from 100+ meters has a high damage has HALF the vertical recoil comperad to the avt, and the same damage and a higer ROF too.
are you braindead?
the avt doesdnt even get more ammo, you’re just a clown
Sorry I forgot like you can’t tape with the AVT40 from 100m+ lol. You’re saying FG has half of the AVT recoil, you know there is hidden stats for the recoil on this game? The AVT40 has literally better stats and has been proved, you’re just talking without knowing a single shit. Keep on being mad, the only retarded clown here is you 
3 Likes
Can you give me some proof? searching the forum the only thing i found was a post (4 moths ago) with a Google file that Is now deleted.
2 Likes
The game has hidden recoil patterns, its common knowlegde and indeed the AVT profits the most from it (but the FGs ofc also have them). The stats ingame are mostly wrong, especially recoil. Dispersion-wise, the AVT also has better accuracy and was something with 0.3 while FGII was low 0.4 or so irrc. Not much and not on MKb vs AVT level but still slightly less dispersion.
Edit: Got access to the file. AVT has 0.26 dispersion, FG/II 0.32 and more recoil. Point still stands though.
At the end, its sidegrade if you prefer a bit more dmg and accuracy or more bullets and slightly better auto recoil.
Vaults data file was pretty much solid (at least no one beyond pissed Soviet and German mains complained) but disappeared a few months ago, most likely because she switched sides and joined the team and the devs never really liked the files as they sometimes deleted posts where people shared the link.
4 Likes
The AVT-50’s actual recoil is vertical: 25.5 horizontal: 9.5
The FG42-II has an actual recoil of vertical: 52.0 horizontal: 10.0
Don’t be so confident in what you don’t know and make outlandish claims, it’s stupid.
Be a Gentleman and a Clown 
5 Likes
In the first place, the end goal of the game is to enter a base and fight enemies to complete the objective.
Mid-range engagements are important, but ultimately, the game is won and lost in close quarters inside the stronghold.
So the FG42 has a mid-range advantage but only has a 20 round magazine, while the Vickers has a high rate of fire and a 100 round magazine, giving it an advantage in close quarters.
In conclusion, it is best to increase magazines for the sustainability of the FG42
The only people talking about skill issues are trolls with sniper rifles and mid to long range engagements.
5 Likes
Yep i wasnt here when this file where uncovered, anyway i see that the avt 40 has a visual recoil of 0.7 that Is more than a svt40 ( at least for what this document says) so no long mid range auto Fire.
My claim still stands the avt Isnt the Absolute Power house ppl claim It to be, but i Will return in Berlin allies and try It maybe from last time i used It they buffed It.
2 Likes
And in a real battle, the airborne troops would be separated from the objective by some distance.
In the game, they drop directly above the objective.
In other words, the person with the high-capacity, high-fire rate gun has the best chance of winning.
If you gave the German airborne troops an MG34 (75 rounds double magazine) as their base weapon, I’m sure the opposing Allied players would be on the forums crying about how it’s too good to be true.
We’re not going to understand each other anyway because this is a disrespectful place, so just bite each other lol. 
5 Likes
Allied players is a legend, there is only two side players and germany suffer players 
3 Likes
That’s why I’ve given up making posts talking about any buffs bigger magazines or talking about the paratroopers at this point
3 Likes