11 is such an undignified number, and with all the specialist and event squads, etc. I think you could bump up the slot number.
13 Likes
Agree, for example half of my BR5 soviet line up is made of just event squad:
AR engineer, rocket radios, paras, T-34/100, NKVD, bush warriors.
With several premium squads like beltfed DP, SU-100, Sherman, APC squad. I hardly have space for more classic TT squads.
9 Likes
begging to pay them more money
oh woe is me i only have three times as many squads as a free to play player
give ftp 2 squad slots or a way to earn them and fine,
but let p2p have four squads for every f2p no just not it is bad enough as is
3 Likes
IMO players should be able to buy atleast 2 squad slots with silver.
5 Likes
I’m not poor, and i don’t give a fuck about a random squad ratio vs. ftp players.
It makes no difference to them whether i have 11 or 15 squads (unless you’re a whiny bitch that is) except that players like me might enjoy the stuff we have more, buy more stuff and support the continued existence of the game also for the ftp entitled choosy beggars.
1 Like
Obviously f2p players should get event squad slot and ability to obtain some extra slots by researching with xp or paying with just silver
Especially given how this game adds more and more essential class types
You need an engineer squad, probably an AT squad, preferably some form of assault squad, now there’s APCs that make a huge difference, paratroopers, the Gorillaz also are awesome at defending/attacking (since you can now actually get into sensible positions and not be stuck in the open thanks to insane grayzone)
And thats even before actual vehicles
3 Likes
100% agree. My Soviets are stacked with a ton of unique event and prem squads to the point where I’m struggling to choose what to remove. 15 would be a good number - and make the first 2-3 able to be bought for silver so F2P can have a few more squads as well.
I also think that the loot box should add a chance to get a “Order for Squad Slot” to be used on a faction of a players choosing.
3 Likes
Completely agree. With the number of unique squads ever increasing + premiums and events, there just isn’t enough space. I have Br1, 2, 3, 4, 5 lineups for the Soviets and Germans, Br2 & 5 for US and Japan, and a Br2 & 5 Prem+Event only for Soviets and Germans. Barely any squad overlap between them cuz there is just so much stuff (especially for Soviets and Germany).
The addition of the Guerillas really threw me for a loop trying to figure out how to fit them in.
Then there is the copious amount of TT and GO weapons that I want to use but just don’t have space for. For example German Br2 has the Knorr and Lahti. That’s 2 squads of gunners out of my 11 slots right there. Ideally I’d like to have an engi, radio, APC, 1 tank, 1 fighter, and 1 attacker too. That’s 8/11. Now guerillas have been added. It’s just too much stuff and no space for it.
2 Likes
There are alot of tools that are only very situationally effective like Mortar squads, but since I have to bring at least 3 Meta infantry squad or I am not helping my team enough it is a shame that there aren’t more squad slots.
2 Likes
of course, you don’t you are in the positive you would get more,
that would be like if the DMV added more lines but only for people with luxury cars
but Suprise a lot of players don’t or can not fork over cash to play
people already complain about lobbies and bots imagine if you
Thanos snap away 10 20 30% percent of the player base
yes payers should have perks but just giving more to payers is taking away from non payers
11 to 4 one side all payers one side all not that is already close to 75% squad control you want to make it 85%
also non payers have cool stuff
simply put the more you favor payers the more that is all you will have
to make it clear i do not mean more payers i mean fewer players
- That’s not true. Stop being a victim.
- I actually would be totally fine with more free slots for everyone (for instance an event squad slot) because I dont actually mind f2p players and myself getting more stuff as I’m not a bitch.
if its not to have something someone does not have then you would be fine if bot ftp and ptp had the same number of slots
but i am guessing no
you would a want even more slots
or b want to get paid back
in spite of a the time you had so many more slots than a ftp
look i get it like event squads you feel you earned it only with a credit card not time
but if you just sell more advantages to ptp it is hurting ftp
i am not against ptp getting more but it must be balanced
the more squads like rocket tanks in game the more pay to win it feels
why don’t paratrooper feel pay to win
you can earn them in game
and sorry but i would feel more like a bitch if i bent over for ptp than complaining
I actually don’t really care (except if the number becomes less for me and i dont get refunded for the slots i paid for, though the 2nd is even not that big of a deal).
But I’m not a moron so i don’t realistically expect that to happen, and therefore your bitter seething about players like me having the chance to support the game more in a meaningful way AND f2p players potentially also getting something more is still dumb.
you already supported the game by buying more slots
you are asking to get even more
i already said fine the ptp can buy four more slots if
ftp can earn in some way 2 slots
so you did not read my post
so it would be ptp max 15 slots
ftp 6 max slots
and there are numersous ways to support already
premium time
the 7 slots already added
premium squads and vehicle
cammo and decorations you cannot buy with silver
you can buy go’s, silver, weapons, go soldiers
premium battle pass, what’s next being able to buy reinforcements in a battle
they already have silenced sniper rifles and rocket vehicles in a game that has no other form of indirect support vehicle
you already can get 11 squads ptp
to 4 for ftp you don’t need a bigger edge