I only told you what is the general opinion on the topic among FPS players. At least from what I know and what I saw through the years.
If you don’t like it, it’s your problem. Either adjust to the majority or find a group of ppl who agree with you to play with them.
Yes, explosions are efficient, that’s why they are often spamed/overused. But they are also not fun to play against. And games are all about fun, everything else is secondary.
Can be said to you as well.
yes and having them is better than having no player at all. as bad as bad players are everyone hates them less than being placed on a bot team. people are going to stop if they make no progress at all. when they do not increase points and kills in a game or over time. sorry but no one wants to be curb stomped or get good this is not dark souls. the people you play against are playing for free for the entertainment and not being paid to be a punching bag for you. this is an arcade game not a mil-sim like hell let loose. the game to a degree balance skill and effort is you want an all-skill game play something else.
this is war
Not an FPS competition or a counter-terrorism operation
But war is never supported by guns alone.
It’s a hodgepodge of things mixed together.
You just want to fight with only guns in the war, that’s just your idea
There is no need for your enemy to change for your cognitive or emotional value.
There is also no need for officials to package the war into a gang fight with only guns.
At least now I know why there are always people crying and massacre victims over camping and other things that aren’t guns and always using infantry suicide charge tactics.
You and them just apply the game standards of different tracks to this game and take it for granted.
You are simply unwilling to face the fact that the gameplay and combat methods of this game are different from the FPS games you played before.
This is a game. A digital entertainment supposed to give fun.
Too much explosives are not fun. End of story.
If they are justified in poisoning teammates for their own emotional value and fun
So why should the enemy be punished for using high-performance equipment and efficient tactics to massacre them for the same reason?
That’s not fair, isn’t it?
Negative people always only care about making themselves happy and hurting their teammates
But players who fight hard are punished for the emotional value and incompetence of passive players?
so
What does this have to do with you transplanting wrong ideas into games with different gameplay?
The theme of this game is war
Not FPS competition and counter-terrorism operations
Your argument is as ridiculous as mistaking a dishwasher for a washing machine and complaining that it can’t wash clothes.
So I won’t complain about players who can show results
Because they are excellent
Even if they can always kill me better or form a team to attack solo players or any other tactics and behaviors that can effectively kill us
I will only summarize the problem on the shortcomings of my own ability or behavior or that of my teammates.
Instead of lowering the enemy’s level by smearing and crying
Why it’s so hard to understand that most ppl don’t like explosive spam?
Deal with it and stop crying.
I don’t mind losing either, but I absolutely “HATE” being seal clubbed. 
In a way, most of the people you’re talking about are just a bunch of cognitively impaired people who apply traditional FPS concepts to games with different gameplay and then complain about it.
My argument is that the war game should regain the diversity it deserves and increase player motivation in order to improve balance.
Then you should ask the official to separate casual players from SEALs.
By diversity you mean 99% of the time all you see are explosions?
Like before detpack, impact and prosporus nerfs when you could as well not bring a gun.
No
I just hope this war game isn’t poisoned by a bunch of cognitively disabled people who are poisoned by FPS competition
Everyone has the right to choose how to play, right?
Just like explosives and high-performance weapons are popular because people like them
but
Your arguments are like those of an extremist group
Only allowing you to like things but complaining and slandering things that don’t conform to your ideas, and then making you cry and slander them so that the officials pity you, the result is twisted into the fact that everyone thinks the same as you.
how pathetic
Apparently no.
Is there a logical conflict between making players responsible for their own actions and choosing how to play?
If you mean by normalcy you mean a group of players with traditional FPS competitive ethics who bring their ideas to War Games and then protest that you are being killed countless times by bombs or other things and then cry about it for 4 years
I’m pretty sure you guys are the ones with the problem.
Isn’t it because people with different opinions will be smeared, spread rumors and labeled by you as long as they speak?
You’re always attacking them.
So there are fewer and fewer people
It’s really standard parasitic behavior.
Attack cells, increase their numbers, and finally kill the host
Apparently only if you dont like it because you dont like penalties for crashing planes.
Norm refers to the general consensus of society. And you can be right as much as you want, but based on your poor like ratios and lack of notable vocal support from other players, you are the extremist in this group with your opinion.
I don’t know how plausible that sounds coming from a child who now writes weekly posts about the suicide penalty and blames the German for his poor reception on the forum.
Maybe your opinion sucks? Maybe your err “presentation skills” suck?
Maybe you are the problem and not society.
But even then, it’s nice to see how much influence one random dude has on you I guess. I feel flattered.
Natural selection I guess.
And again, I didn’t know I had such an impact.
Except which numbers do I increase on a forum?
There’s nothing wrong with the gameplay itself, so there’s no need to be restricted.
I also provide a more aggressive active interception penalty scheme to stop endless vehicles
The only difference between them is whether someone shoots at the plane
The general consensus you speak of is the same as political correctness
As long as you continue to slander and spread rumors, you will look important and eventually get what you want.
This is just group violence and oppression
Then you are indeed no different from extremist groups
I think I probably haven’t spoken about discrimination in Germany yet
Which is why you want to limit it as well by penalties.
Do you mean your average four dead vehicles and the occasional AI bomber run?
Ironic coming from someone who flags other people.
And still, you are not representing the consensus, you are just representing a minority.
You could never disprove that you have a poor kill-death efficiency so it’s not really a rumor at this point.
Again, feel flattered I guess.
Like abusing Alt accounts to flag other people like you do all the time?
Again, you do not get basic concepts of politics.
And I think you don’t get the concept of jokes, which is fair since you flag memes.
