Well, for exemple to protect high BR players from Tunisia.
Just desert like most ppl do when they get bad map. No big deal.
1 Like
How about just improving the maps and removing cave village
3 Likes
Desertion should be properly and rightfully punished, itâs not a solution.
Until we have map/campaign ban, campaigns like Tunisia should definitely not be spread across all BRs.
1 Like
Itâs just your personal feelings torwards 3 maps. Imo not a big deal overall.
1 Like
According to robihrâs players count stats Tunisia was the most unpopular and dead campaign of all 6.
So itâs not only about âmy feelingsâ. It was always the worst campaign with the worst maps.
Btw. Which is completely fascinating since that campaign included completely unique things like Italians and brits.
Yet it was still the most unpopular campaign.
itâs not true, low br germany very few (rare times) tunisia br 2 you can find moscow, stalingrad, beglio, normandy and maybe maybe maybe tunisia in fact Iâm very annoyed because I created a low br for tunisia and I find myself playing on maps from br 5 rubbish
2 Likes
Rzhev, Stalingrad, Tunisia, Moscow should be BR 1-3 only.
They should never see Tiger 2s.
Other high BR maps can be added later.
1 Like
Agree, but not until more high BR maps are added.
1 Like
Thatâs why instead of Rzhev (historically BR 1-3) they really should be adding either high BR maps (Bagration), all BR maps (Belarus) or generic map like âTown in Ukraineâ.
Adding Rzhev with BR 1-5 makes zero sense.
1 Like
the village with the caves actually exists, they are ancient villages from the Roman era
1 Like
Well, thatâs what I have suggested to them as well several months ago during test servers for merge.
And thatâs why I was really pushing for Manchuria. Both Japanese and Soviet desperately need more late war maps.
But I really wanted Rzhev too. So I am little bit biased here and donât mind they acted not logically.
99% of players prefer queuing up on the edge of a large pothole to shoot each other rather than walking through the nearby tunnel.
1 Like
Maybe because ppl werenât interested in grinding a 6th campaign from 0? Personally thatâs why I wasnât interested in it.
Tbh we will never know why it wasnât popular. Or at least I have no clue how to check it.
2 Likes
It was third campaign, not sixth.
1st was moscow
2nd was normandy
3rd was berlin
4th was tunesia I guess?
5th was stlingrad
6th was pacific
So tunesia was 4th, my bad.
Still, for me I just couldnât be bothered with grinding tunesia or stalingrad. I suspect many f2p players also felt this way. But thatâs pure speculation.
1 Like
Yeah, lol. Looks like I canât count to four.
1 Like
Moscow maps with Tiger 2 and Ju188 would be pain in the ass in terms of gameplay.
Me neither 
1 Like
I donât think it would be much different from Ardennes map.
2 Likes