If more than 30% of players abandon the game, reward the ones who stay with +50% campaign xp

[FORparker]

About 10% of the experience will be rewarded after continuously playing the game. There will be no additional experience reward if you do not persist in playing the game. Or the acquisition progress of silver and copper cards is not provided.Will it work?

[ArtJane]

Is it worth changing something? Those who pour out of the battle and so get much less than those who play to the last. Why touch anything?

[Brachiales]

Well, not really.
If you get a “battle hero award” you don’t lose a point. And If you end up in a bad team, that is easy to achieve.

[Shiivex]

Consider me. As example that I have all campaigns maxed.

Should I care about xp using your argument? If I want to leave I leave lmao. Why should I care to stay on a match if I m not enjoying it or i don’t want that map or mode…

Also I have 300+ to 400 marshal points as of now. I could leave hundreds of batles and still wasnt even affected by it

[robihr]

i dont mind losing… as long as there is good battle. but when i am in a team with 6-7 bots vs full team of maxed out players i dont see any incentive to stay. i would even want to quit some winning battles cause they are so boring when my team is too strong and i cant get kill cause everyone is racing to farm enemies at gray zone.

that is why we need full pvp to make battles more interesting. this half pve is boring.

[NobodyGood]

If you only get the 50% bonus IF you win then it something earnt otherwise you deserve nothing.

[BandytaJeden]

Maybe, but just maybe, hear this out:
make game not suck ass, so people don’t desert instead of adding another pointless system that fixes NOTHING

[Enlisted_Thunder]

XP multiplier of less human side for a balance compensate?

Currently, match human count are always unequal (due to lack players and unbalanced players count for different mode and faction, soviet always tend to play in solo, german tend to play squad mode). Because human players always performe much better than bots, so which side has more human, then that side will more likely to win. This cause an unfair to those who played in the less human side. They get worse gameplay, less XP, and etc. So what about using a XP multiplier at the end of match, giv…

–Dec 2020.

Current matchmaking system is a complete flaw!

First, I do not play WT. So I dont know what’s going on there. But this game is not WT, and is a FPS game. FPS is a lot different and more sensible in all kinds of aspect. Like the match joining mechanism. (Not matchmaking because you can manually join a match) The worst part of current matchmaking or the mechanism of joining a match is that it dosent provide any balance of player count in each side! So often, you may end up in 1vs5 or even 3vs21+. Like these: [image] [image] [image] [ima…

–Feb 2021

Give compensation to team being outnumbered (human count) or lots of players mid-quit

Old topic… Mid quit yeah, penalty those quiters. But where’s the compensation? Game already take away 0.3x of their XP. Also take away XP multiplier [image] Game STILL REWARD to those who already left, and they are UNABLE to get multiplier’s XP. Those XP should be giving to the player who plays to the end as a compensation!!! Also, give players which side is being outnumbered by human count compensation! We all know there’s BOTs to fill the unequal human counts. [image] If human counts…

–Feb 2022

[Crivat]

3 consecutive rounds of armoured train escort is enough to make one quit. Also i’ve had several ocasions where the connection was bad when Stalingrad released and it was unplayable. Furthermore, sometimes in Berlin, because of the sun, my FPS would drop from 100+ to 20smth and it became unplayable. So here are some reasons one might quit a battle, also taking into consideration emergencies that would make a player quit a match.

[Curst]

@BandytaJeden

Maybe, but just maybe, hear this out:
make game not suck ass, so people don’t desert instead of adding another pointless system that fixes NOTHING

Quitters are making the game suck even more. Why not start with yourself and make it suck less by not quitting? No, I understand it’s not your job to make it better, but destroying whatever is left is not the answer either.

[Brrady]

There are always going to be reasons that would be understandable for people to leave the game, bolt of lightning hits the telephone pole and your Internet connection is severed … An act of God.

And of course it’s hard to argue with the emotional component, playing three rounds in a row of a horrible match is something that is more than mortal man should have to endure.

And before coming down too hard on people that are just up and leaving the match because they don’t like the look of it at first glance, which does seem kind of, not cool…

It really does seem that the onus is on the developers to create an environment where people don’t want to do that, it shouldn’t really have to be up to the players to suck it up to make a better gaming experience for everybody else by staying in a match that they would otherwise want to leave or simply not play.

[BandytaJeden]

Thanks, You convinced me
I will now join more matches just to desret and afk in them.

Like WHY WOULD I CARE IF THIS GAME SUCCEDS, IT’S THE DEVS FUCKING JOB, WE GIVE FEEDBACK, THEY DONT GIVE A FUCK ABOUT IT.

I made 3 threads outlining why people desert and how to fix it, it’s fucking simple as 1+1 just veto map and gamemodes.
NAH FUCKING RANK BS,

QUITTERS AINT MAKING THIS GAME SUCKS, GAIJIN IS

[BandytaJeden]

Normandy got ruined by shitters spamming arty and plane bombs.

Np, i just start playing Berlin

Shitty train unbalanced garbage mode added, so bad they changed it to two maps that suck twice as much.
NO THANKS

I will forever desert this garbage gamemode, and i understand people deserting when matches just started, either by seeing shitty map/gamemode or stacked team.

IT’S DEVS THAT CAN FIX IT, NOT US, WHY YOU BALME PLAYERS YOU STOCKHOLS SYNDOME GAIJIN WHALES

[Curst]

You’re only hurting other players by quitting. The only practical way to make them change is by voting with the thing you’ve invested in it - your money and/or time. Making other players angry doesn’t do anything by itself. Especially if they follow your lead and do the abusive relationship thing, continuing to invest into the game even though they hate it and don’t think it will get better.

Also Enlisted isn’t even developped by Gaijin…

@Brrady

It really does seem that the onus is on the developers to create an environment where people don’t want to do that, it shouldn’t really have to be up to the players to suck it up to make a better gaming experience for everybody else by staying in a match that they would otherwise want to leave or simply not play.

I wasn’t implying that players need to suck it up. I was implying that they should either play or not play. Continuously joining battles only to ruin the game for other doesn’t help anyone. I suppose most of them don’t intentionally join the match only to quit it, but it should be a sign to reevaluate things if you feel like you “have to” quit games so much.

[BandytaJeden]

@Curst

it should be a sign to reevaluate things if you feel like you “have to” quit games so much

Gamemode sucks, i quit
I got 10 bots in team, i quit
Simple, i can’t fix this shit.

Even worse, when i play, as veteran i end up mowing down new players. I now play with dude i played against and he said playing against me was not fun, I WONDER WHY.

I’m hurting this game more when i play. Exploisive spam is cancer, automatic weapons spam is cancer, exploiting shitty map spawns is cancer.

@Curst

The only practical way to make them change is by voting with the thing you’ve invested in it

I won’t spend dime more, in fact i haven’t in half a year when shit hit the fan with stalingrad and sash grab simulator.

They don’t care

I don’t care

I will be cancer that kills this game if they don’t want to fix it.
It’s not developed by gaijin, but we all know who squeezes darkflow balls for money and got final say here